20.02.2013 Views

Qualitative_data_analysis

Qualitative_data_analysis

Qualitative_data_analysis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

26 QUALITATIVE DATA ANALYSIS<br />

quantities and not the ‘qualities’ involved? Perhaps. But we are assuming that ‘years’<br />

are of (sufficiently) equal length and therefore bear a consistent relation to the<br />

length of a life. If our mother was an ancient Roman, the number of years lived<br />

might bear no consistent relation to the length of her life. The Romans used a lunar<br />

rather than a solar calendar, and had to continually adjust the year by adding in<br />

extra days. The calendar was in such a mess by 47 BC that Caesar made the year<br />

445 days long (Coveney and Highfield 1991:43)! The variable ‘years old’ in fact<br />

expresses a quite sophisticated classification, one which is a cultural product<br />

reflecting the culmination (to date) of a long and complex political and scientific<br />

process. If this example seems obscure, then consider contemporary Japan, where<br />

years of age are reckoned prospectively rather than retrospectively—a Japanese baby<br />

during the first year is reckoned as a one-year-old. We can all tell (or lie about) how<br />

many years old we are, but only because (and insofar as) the calendar has become<br />

established as a standard measure of the passage of time.<br />

What about the number of children? This too depends upon common, taken-forgranted<br />

assumptions about what it means to ‘have children’. But with the growth of<br />

single parent families and ‘step’ relationships, and technological advances in the<br />

shape of artificial insemination and test tube babies, this has become problematic. In<br />

this changing cultural context, our common understanding of what ‘having a child’<br />

means has become less definite. It may be necessary, for example, to distinguish<br />

clearly between biological and social relationships. For example, we might define<br />

‘having children’ as ‘giving birth to a child’ (effectively excluding men from having<br />

children!). But in some circumstances, even this may not be sufficient. Redmond<br />

O’Hanlon (1988) recounts the story of a social scientist trying to establish for social<br />

security purposes the number of child dependents in an Amazonian village. The<br />

hapless researcher was confounded by two women claiming to have given birth to<br />

the same child! Before we can determine how many children a mother has, we have<br />

to achieve a common understanding of what this means. If we intend to make<br />

quantitative comparisons, we must first make certain we are comparing ‘like with<br />

like’ by achieving a consistent qualitative interpretation of what it means to ‘have a<br />

child’.<br />

We must therefore look behind the numbers, to what the information we have<br />

means and how it can be used. In other words, we must identify the appropriate<br />

level of measurement for the <strong>data</strong>. If we ignore the level of measurement, we can<br />

easily think we know more about the <strong>data</strong> than we actually do. For example, in the<br />

university where I work the grading and marking scale in Illustration 2.2 is in<br />

operation.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!