20.02.2013 Views

Qualitative_data_analysis

Qualitative_data_analysis

Qualitative_data_analysis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 15.3 Distribution of responses by case<br />

PRODUCING AN ACCOUNT 267<br />

How strong is that pattern? If we look at the frequency and distribution of these<br />

examples, we find a reasonable spread across the <strong>data</strong>, with no concentration in<br />

particular cases (Table 15.3). ‘Active’ and ‘passive’ responses are woven through the<br />

letters, with only the final letter making no reference to patient response at all.<br />

While this suggests a gender-stereotyping pattern is woven through the letters, if<br />

we look at the <strong>data</strong> in terms of patients rather than responses, we find the picture is<br />

not quite so clear. For example, three of the six examples of ‘passive’ responses<br />

amongst women relate to one patient, Claire Memling. We also find that in the case<br />

of two patients, Claire Memling and Mrs Schwimmer, initial passivity eventually<br />

turns into an ‘active’ response. That leaves only two examples, Mrs Zardis and Mrs<br />

Fetelman, where female patients (and not just their response) are unambiguously<br />

‘passive’.<br />

Nevertheless, the balance of evidence does suggest a gender-stereotyping pattern<br />

of responses. The most clear-cut and dramatic examples in the <strong>data</strong> all tend to<br />

confirm this pattern, while as we have seen the negative evidence is less clear-cut and<br />

dramatic. Overall, we may reasonably conclude that Woody Allen has portrayed a<br />

gender-stereotyped view in his depiction of patient responses.<br />

Although this example refers to very little <strong>data</strong>, the principles involved can easily<br />

be applied to more extensive <strong>data</strong>, without unduly extending the length of the<br />

<strong>analysis</strong>. Obviously the more <strong>data</strong> is involved, however, the more we may have to<br />

select and summarize the <strong>data</strong>, while still providing sufficient information to<br />

validate our interpretations. Unfortunately, the technological limitations of<br />

traditional forms of publication impose constraints which mean we cannot<br />

reproduce the interactive environment of a computer-based account. Ideally, we<br />

should be able to link summaries to <strong>data</strong>bits, and <strong>data</strong>bits to context, so that at any<br />

time readers can check for themselves the validity of our interpretations by accessing<br />

the original <strong>data</strong> in context. If accounts were stored on disk, the reader could have

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!