20.02.2013 Views

Qualitative_data_analysis

Qualitative_data_analysis

Qualitative_data_analysis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

worrying unduly about the connections between them. Why does the shoe fit only<br />

Cinderella’s foot? Because that is what fits the story line. The story works as an art<br />

form, not as an explanation of events (cf. Burgess 1982).<br />

In producing an account, therefore, we have to treat as problematic what in<br />

stories only serve as props. Because we are dealing with human beings with particular<br />

biographies, and social processes which are historically specific, we can learn from<br />

the techniques of story-telling. However, we must also take care to avoid its pitfalls,<br />

for otherwise our account may obscure more than it reveals. Story-telling techniques<br />

can be used to enhance <strong>analysis</strong>, but not as a substitute for it. Our choice of<br />

techniques must be guided by the object of our research and our purpose in<br />

presenting an account (Sayer 1992:262). Our overriding concern must be to<br />

produce an account which is adequate as well as accessible.<br />

• Engage interest through description and dramatization<br />

• Trace the evolution of our account<br />

• Develop overall coherence<br />

• Select key themes<br />

• Use simple language<br />

• Make concepts and connections explicit<br />

PRODUCING AN ACCOUNT 255<br />

Before we leave the issue of accessibility, I must recommend a book by Becker<br />

(1986) on writing for social scientists for a fuller discussion of issues (including the<br />

use of metaphors) which I can only touch on here. As well as noting some of the<br />

qualities of good writing, such as the avoidance of abstract nouns, passive<br />

constructions and the like, Becker emphasizes the importance of reviewing and<br />

editing what you have written. Why use twenty words when two will do? We may use<br />

twenty words in our first draft, as we struggle to express some bashful idea through a<br />

process akin to free association or brain storming. But there is no excuse for<br />

retaining those twenty words, once the idea has been brought to light and we have<br />

had an opportunity to revise our thinking (and writing) to render it more precise<br />

(and concise). Unless you are one of those rare geniuses like Mozart whose<br />

compositions come original and complete in every detail, redrafting is essential to<br />

eliminate the needless repetition and unnecessary clutter associated with creative<br />

writing.<br />

If editing—and re-editing—offers the key to using clear and direct language, the<br />

computer offers the key to editing. As Becker suggests, the computer can change the<br />

way we think and write. This is because the editing facilities it provides are so<br />

powerful. Because the ‘on-screen’ text can be amended instantly and with ease, the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!