Qualitative_data_analysis
Qualitative_data_analysis
Qualitative_data_analysis
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
PRODUCING AN ACCOUNT 253<br />
associations, and lead us to make (or stumble upon) connections in ways we might<br />
not otherwise have anticipated.<br />
This brings us to another aspect of story-telling, the use of language. This can be<br />
one of the most engaging aspects of a story. The overall style of a story may be<br />
inappropriate to an analytic report, though as I suggested earlier we can use some<br />
elements of story-telling to improve our presentation. But we can certainly learn<br />
from the language of story-telling. One feature of story-telling language which we<br />
can borrow is its directness. To be successful, the author has to ‘make a connection’<br />
with his or her reader. To make that connection, the author must communicate<br />
effectively, with language unencumbered by needlessly technical terms and<br />
unnecessarily obtuse expressions. Plain and simple, crisp and to the point. It is well<br />
known that it is hardest of all to write stories for children. This is because the<br />
clearest and most economical language is also the most difficult to achieve. This is<br />
partly because when we write, we are often trying to do more than just<br />
communicate effectively with our audience. We may want to dazzle them! Or<br />
perhaps we want to cloak our lack of self-confidence in language, hiding the<br />
suspected poverty of our ideas and the vagueness of our thinking behind an<br />
impenetrable barrier of obscure terminology! Language can serve social as well as<br />
psychological ends, and in an academic context, this can encourage the use of<br />
needless jargon, as a way of establishing one’s credentials as a member of an<br />
exclusive club. The Oxford Dictionary (1976:578) defines jargon as follows:<br />
‘jargon n. Unintelligible words, gibberish, barbarous or debased language;<br />
mode of speech familiar only to a group or profession; (arch.) twittering<br />
of birds’<br />
Perhaps the irony is unintended, but one suspects the author meant to imply that<br />
debased language is a particular prerogative of the professions!<br />
By focusing above all on telling our story, we may be able to keep such abuses in<br />
check. Using simple and direct language is one way of establishing clear<br />
communication. Another aspect of story-telling language is the use of metaphor. We<br />
are in the middle of a metaphor at this moment, in which I am applying one idea<br />
—‘telling a story’—to another—‘producing an account’—to which it is not literally<br />
applicable. Using metaphors can enrich an account by conveying connotations<br />
which elaborate on and illuminate our basic meaning. To ‘tell a story’ has<br />
connotations—some of which I have already tried to indicate—which are notconveyed<br />
by the expression ‘producing an account’. To ‘tell a story’ is to do<br />
something vital and interesting, perhaps even exciting. By comparison, ‘producing<br />
an account’ sounds far more pragmatic and pedestrian, even pedantic. The one is an<br />
activity we associate with novelists, the other we associate with accountants. The