20.02.2013 Views

Qualitative_data_analysis

Qualitative_data_analysis

Qualitative_data_analysis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figure 13.20 Identifying positive and negative categories<br />

Using lines to represent connections between categories<br />

OF MAPS AND MATRICES 223<br />

• Length of line can represent the type of relationship<br />

• Arrows can represent the direction of the relationship<br />

• Positive and negative signs can indicate the value of the<br />

relationship<br />

• Line thickness can represent the empirical scope of the relationship<br />

As well as a key to the meaning of our shapes and lines, we can provide additional<br />

information in order to interpret these maps. In order to compare the distance<br />

between two points on a map, we need to know its scale. Otherwise we may be able<br />

to tell that one distance is nearer or further than another, but we won’t be able to<br />

judge what this means in terms of metres or miles. To complete the picture,<br />

therefore, we need to know what these differences in scope actually mean, for<br />

example, in terms of the average number of categorized or linked <strong>data</strong>bits which<br />

have been assigned to a case. We (or rather, the computer) have to use some sort of<br />

scale in terms of which to translate a number into a shape or line of appropriate<br />

dimensions. Does a single line represent an average of one link per case, or ten links<br />

per case, or what? Whatever the scale—and we may have to adjust it according to the<br />

volume of categorized or linked <strong>data</strong> we are dealing with—if we make it explicit<br />

then the reader can interpret our map accordingly.<br />

Although we have focused on causal connections, mapping can also be used to<br />

explore other relationships. Take the concurrence of categories, for example.<br />

Suppose we are interested in how often our two main categories, ‘incongruity’ and<br />

‘catharsis’ concur in the <strong>data</strong>. We can map out how far the two categories concur,<br />

and how far they may have been assigned separately to the <strong>data</strong>. In Figure 13.21 I

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!