Qualitative_data_analysis

Figure 13.10 Comparing differences in scope through a bar chart
Figure 13.11 Using overlaps to indicate scale
This method of graphic representation could be extended to other categories as
required. For example, we could also represent the scope of the subcategories of
‘suffering’ or ‘stereotypes’, or the overarching categories such as ‘incongruity’ or
‘catharsis’. Notice though that if we indicate the scope of overarching categories, the
reader cannot gain any indication of the scope of any subcategories; whereas
including information on the scope of subcategories also indicates the scope of the
overarching categories (Figure 13.13).
By giving the scope of the most refined categories in our map we allow the reader
to assess the significance of the overarching categories. On the other hand, we may
make it less easy to assess at a glance the relative scope of categories at the same level
of classification. We could of course simply give the scope of all categories included
in the analysis, whatever the level of classification, providing our categories are few
and this does not over-complicate our presentation.
Mapping categories
OF MAPS AND MATRICES 217
• Shapes and patterns can represent different types of category
• Size can represent differences in empirical scope of categories
• Alignment can be used to compare differences in empirical scope
• Differences in scope need only be represented for the most refined
categories