Qualitative_data_analysis
Qualitative_data_analysis
Qualitative_data_analysis
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
INTRODUCTION 7<br />
First of all, I take a rather eclectic view of the sources of qualitative <strong>data</strong>. The<br />
association of qualitative <strong>data</strong> with unstructured methods is one which I challenge in<br />
the following chapter. Problems of conceptualization are as important in surveys as<br />
in any other research methods, and problems of interpretation and classification are<br />
as important to survey <strong>data</strong> as in any other context (Marsh 1982).<br />
Secondly, I take a similarly eclectic view of qualitative <strong>analysis</strong>. Analysis aimed at<br />
describing situations or informing policy seems to me no less legitimate and<br />
worthwhile than <strong>analysis</strong> geared to generating theory. I also assume that we may be<br />
as interested in identifying and describing ‘singularities’, in the sense of unique<br />
events or cases, as in identifying and explaining regularities and variations in our<br />
<strong>data</strong>. Throughout the book, I assume that qualitative <strong>analysis</strong> requires a dialectic<br />
between ideas and <strong>data</strong>. We cannot analyse the <strong>data</strong> without ideas, but our ideas must<br />
be shaped and tested by the <strong>data</strong> we are analysing. In my view this dialectic informs<br />
qualitative <strong>analysis</strong> from the outset, making debates about whether to base <strong>analysis</strong><br />
primarily on ideas (through deduction) or on the <strong>data</strong> (through induction) rather<br />
sterile (Chapter 5). This dialectic may be less disciplined than in the natural<br />
sciences, where experiment and quantitative measurement provide a firmer basis for<br />
examining evidence; but the search for corroborating evidence is nevertheless a<br />
crucial feature of qualitative <strong>analysis</strong> (Chapter 14). It is also a vital element in<br />
producing an adequate as well as an accessible account (Chapter 15).<br />
Thirdly, I take a pragmatic view of analytic procedures (cf. Giarelli 1988). My<br />
main aim is to give a practical introduction to analytic procedures. The book<br />
describes a range of procedures we can follow for managing <strong>data</strong> (Chapter 6),<br />
reading and annotating (Chapter 7), categorizing (Chapters 8, 9 and 10), linking<br />
<strong>data</strong> (Chapter 11), connecting categories (Chapter 12) and using maps and matrices<br />
(Chapter 13). While these procedures are presented sequentially, in practice the mix<br />
and order of procedures adopted in qualitative <strong>analysis</strong> will vary. The choice of any<br />
particular permutation of procedures depends upon factors like the characteristics of<br />
the <strong>data</strong>, the objectives of the project, the predilections of the researchers, and the<br />
time and resources available to them.<br />
If we consider qualitative <strong>data</strong> <strong>analysis</strong> (somewhat misleadingly) in terms of a<br />
logical succession of steps leading from our first encounters with the <strong>data</strong> through to<br />
the production of an account, then the various steps considered in this book can be<br />
depicted as in Figure 1.1. Because of its importance in conceptualizing <strong>data</strong>, three<br />
chapters are devoted to the tasks of categorizing, and a further two chapters to ways<br />
of making connections between categories. The intervening step (Chapter 11) is<br />
concerned with linking <strong>data</strong>, as an innovative technique for overcoming the<br />
fragmentation of <strong>data</strong> produced by categorization, and providing a firm basis for<br />
identifying conceptual connections between categories.