Qualitative_data_analysis
Qualitative_data_analysis
Qualitative_data_analysis
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
164 QUALITATIVE DATA ANALYSIS<br />
Figure 11.3 Linking dentists and patients<br />
through our interaction with the <strong>data</strong>. Like our category set, we may make a list of<br />
links in advance and modify it as we go along, or we may prefer to derive it directly<br />
from the <strong>data</strong>. However we proceed, the links we devise ought to meet both our<br />
conceptual and empirical requirements. There is no point in devising a link which is<br />
fine in theory but has no practical application; nor is there any point in making<br />
links which do not relate to the overall <strong>analysis</strong>.<br />
Like our category set, we also have to decide how long our links list should be.<br />
This again will depend upon the volume and complexity of our <strong>data</strong> and the<br />
conceptual aims of our <strong>analysis</strong>. Unlike our category set, though, our links list can<br />
be very short, confined to only a few items or perhaps even (dispensing with a list<br />
altogether) to a single item. We could not base a categorical <strong>analysis</strong> upon a single<br />
category, but we could confine our <strong>analysis</strong> of relationships to a single link, such as<br />
causality. On the other hand, if we identify too many links, we may be overwhelmed<br />
by the complexity of relationships which we can observe within the <strong>data</strong>, and lose<br />
consistency and coherence in our <strong>analysis</strong>.<br />
Potentially, there are as many links as there are transitive verbs in the English<br />
language. A transitive verb is an archetypal link which connects a subject and an<br />
object. When we parody, satirize, lampoon, mock, or ridicule something, we<br />
establish a relation between ourselves and the (unfortunate) object of our attentions.<br />
In practice, only a subset of possible relationships is likely to be of interest to the<br />
analyst. Our link list will reflect our preoccupations—if we are mainly interested in<br />
how meaning is communicated, for example, we will focus on different links than if<br />
we want to account for social action. Amongst social scientists, one common<br />
interest is in causal relationships, where X causes Y (or Y is caused by X). But<br />
causality is only one, if the most obvious, of many possible links (Illustration 11.1).<br />
We may be interested in the intelligibility of social action, for example, and devise a<br />
range of links such as explanation, exculpation, rationalization and so on. We may<br />
look for consistency or contradictions within the <strong>data</strong>, looking for areas of mutual<br />
support or opposition. Or we may on theoretical grounds anticipate more specific<br />
connections, and observe through linking how far these are evident in the <strong>data</strong>. For