20.02.2013 Views

Qualitative_data_analysis

Qualitative_data_analysis

Qualitative_data_analysis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 11<br />

Linking <strong>data</strong><br />

Categorizing the <strong>data</strong> allows us to compare observations in terms of relations of<br />

similarity and difference. Of any two observations, X and Y, we can ask if they are<br />

similar or different. How are they the same, or how do they differ? This is powerful<br />

stuff; categories are the conceptual building blocks from which we can construct our<br />

theoretical edifices. But they also have limitations. In breaking up the <strong>data</strong>, we lose<br />

information about relationships between different parts of the <strong>data</strong>. We lose our<br />

sense of process—of how things interact or ‘hang together’. To capture this<br />

information, we need to link <strong>data</strong> as well as categorize it.<br />

To recall a distinction made earlier, linking <strong>data</strong> involves recognizing substantive<br />

rather than formal relations between things. Formal relations are concerned with<br />

how things relate in terms of similarity and difference—how far they do or do not<br />

share the same characteristics. Substantive relations are concerned with how things<br />

interact. Things which are connected through interaction need not be similar, and<br />

vice versa (Sayer 1992:88). For example, in formal terms we can distinguish<br />

‘dentists’ and ‘patients’ as two distinct categories, based on differences between these<br />

social roles. However, there is a substantive connection between these two roles,<br />

despite the formal differences between them. Dentists have skills and patients need<br />

treatment. Indeed, one cannot be a dentist without a patient, or a patient without a<br />

dentist. To understand these social roles, we have to recognize the substantive<br />

relation that exists between them.<br />

Sayer (1992:88–89) distinguishes between relations which are ‘internal’ or<br />

‘necessary’ and relations which are ‘external’ or ‘contingent’. The relation between<br />

dentist and patient is internal or necessary in the sense that one social role<br />

necessarily presupposes the other. An external or contingent relation is one which may<br />

exist but need not do so. For example, dentists need to make a living, but how this<br />

is financed and whether or not the patient pays for treatment at the point of service<br />

is a contingent relation between the two. A dentist cannot practise without a<br />

patient, but a dentist can practise without receiving direct payment from the patient.<br />

Where the patient has to pay at the point of service, this establishes a substantive<br />

but contingent connection between patient and dentist. Clearly, contingent

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!