20.02.2013 Views

Qualitative_data_analysis

Qualitative_data_analysis

Qualitative_data_analysis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Using Hypertext linking, whenever necessary we can re-examine the <strong>data</strong>bit<br />

within its original context. Suppose, for example, we forget what is meant by ‘it’ in<br />

the <strong>data</strong>bit ‘now she’s upset that it won’t fit her mouth’. We can go directly to the<br />

original text and check what ‘it’ refers to—the ‘billowing bridge’. If we have become<br />

thoroughly familiar with our <strong>data</strong>, we may find that the occasions when we require<br />

to do so are surprisingly rare. We are not likely to forget that ‘billowing bridge’ in a<br />

hurry!<br />

Nevertheless, in abstracting <strong>data</strong>bits in this way we suffer a significant<br />

information loss. What do we gain by way of compensation? We gain the<br />

opportunity to think about our <strong>data</strong> in a new way. We can now make comparisons<br />

between all the different <strong>data</strong>bits which we have assigned to a particular category. We<br />

can compare the <strong>data</strong>bits assigned to one category with those assigned to another. On<br />

this basis, we can further clarify our categories and contribute to developing the<br />

conceptual framework through which we can apprehend our <strong>data</strong>. This process is<br />

likely to involve two main tasks, which I have called ‘splitting’ and ‘splicing’<br />

categories. Splitting refers to the task of refining categories by subcategorizing <strong>data</strong>.<br />

Splicing refers to combining categories to provide a more integrated<br />

conceptualization. Let us consider each in turn.<br />

SPLITTING CATEGORIES<br />

SPLITTING AND SPLICING 139<br />

I described categorizing as a process of drawing distinctions within the <strong>data</strong>. This<br />

process is twofold. We divide up the <strong>data</strong> into bits, distinguishing one bit from<br />

another; and we assign a <strong>data</strong>bit to one or more categories, distinguishing it thereby<br />

from <strong>data</strong>bits assigned to other categories. In other words, categorizing involves<br />

subdividing the <strong>data</strong> as well as assigning categories.<br />

With subcategorizing, we may no longer need to subdivide our <strong>data</strong> in quite the<br />

same way. Subcategorizing can be done using the existing <strong>data</strong>bits without further<br />

subdivisions within our <strong>data</strong>bits. We can split up our category into a number of<br />

subcategories which we can then assign to the <strong>data</strong>bits which already belong to that<br />

category. The process of splitting up a category into subcategories is not just<br />

conceptual. It involves assigning the various <strong>data</strong>bits to appropriate subcategories,<br />

and is therefore grounded in our <strong>analysis</strong> of these <strong>data</strong>bits. However, we do not need<br />

to make any further subdivisions within <strong>data</strong>bits as opposed to distinctions between<br />

them.<br />

On the other hand, it is most unlikely that our initial categorization will have<br />

exhausted the distinctions we can draw within the <strong>data</strong>. If our <strong>data</strong> is at all

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!