20.02.2013 Views

Qualitative_data_analysis

Qualitative_data_analysis

Qualitative_data_analysis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

have annotated this <strong>data</strong>. Suppose we have already made a memo reading as in<br />

Illustration 9.4.<br />

ILLUSTRATION 9.4<br />

CHECKING MEMOS PRIOR TO CATEGORIZING DATA<br />

ASSIGNING CATEGORIES 129<br />

The letters open with Vincent’s statement of despair. Does this not<br />

immediately suggest a stereotype of the artistic temperament, prone to<br />

exaggerated emotions? Is there not an element of self-pity suggested here in<br />

Vincent’s complaint about life’s unfairness—to him? (It hasn’t been very<br />

fair to Mrs Sol Schwimmer.) Look out for similar displays of temperament.<br />

This memo suggests a possible categorization in terms of temperament. Also, we<br />

need to read the <strong>data</strong>bit in context. Vincent’s despair is a result of Mrs Sol<br />

Schwimmer’s search for legal redress following her disfigurement. If Mrs Sol<br />

Schwimmer’s suit is reasonable, is Vincent’s despair unreasonable? The <strong>data</strong>bit takes<br />

on new meaning, if we recognize the absurdity of the action which has precipitated<br />

it. It is no longer just an ‘innocent’ statement of how Vincent feels. It is an<br />

expression of Vincent’s fundamental folly in complaining because he cannot act as<br />

he likes regardless of the consequences for others.<br />

We can run through our list of categories, and consider whether there is a<br />

category which obviously suggests itself at this point. We have a short category set<br />

(at least to start with) so there is no problem checking through all of it. But with a<br />

longer list of categories, it would obviously be more efficient to concentrate on likely<br />

prospects and discount non-contenders. We may be able to divide our list into<br />

probables and improbables, possibles and impossibles; and then consider whether<br />

any of the probables or possibles applies.<br />

From our short list, the category ‘stereotypes’ is one possibility. But we should<br />

also consider other possibilities, not as yet included in our current category set. Our<br />

memo mentions ‘stereotypes’ but it is also more precise: it suggests that this is a specific<br />

stereotype, one which invokes the image of the over-emotional artist. Should we add<br />

a category ‘temperament’ to our category set and assign it to this <strong>data</strong>bit? To make<br />

this decision, we must consider the existing category set and reflect upon the virtues<br />

and drawbacks of extending it.<br />

Since we have a short and relatively undifferentiated category list, let us add<br />

‘temperament’ to it. But before we assign this category, we should consider how we<br />

are using it. As we are categorizing our very first <strong>data</strong>bit, there are no previous<br />

empirical examples to refer to. We must therefore concentrate on conceptual<br />

clarification of the category. This could take the form of a first attempt at defining

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!