20.02.2013 Views

The International Political Thought of Carl Schmitt: Terror, Liberal ...

The International Political Thought of Carl Schmitt: Terror, Liberal ...

The International Political Thought of Carl Schmitt: Terror, Liberal ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2 Geopolitics and grosspolitics<br />

From <strong>Carl</strong> <strong>Schmitt</strong> to E. H. Carr and<br />

James Burnham<br />

Mika Luoma-aho<br />

Introduction: <strong>Schmitt</strong> and grosspolitics<br />

In 1939, with Germany’s foreign policy becoming a major issue in European<br />

affairs, <strong>Carl</strong> <strong>Schmitt</strong>’s Völkerrechtliche Großraumordnung mit Interventionsverbot<br />

für raumfremde Mächte was certainly noticed. Several German newspapers<br />

published long articles describing <strong>Schmitt</strong>’s Großraum-theory, and the foreign<br />

press also took notice <strong>of</strong> <strong>Schmitt</strong>’s lecture: two British newspapers presented<br />

<strong>Schmitt</strong> as the theorist behind Hitler’s expansion in Europe (Bendersky 1983:<br />

237–242, 250–252). Though it is not <strong>of</strong>ten recognised as such, Völkerrechtliche<br />

Großraumordnung is also an academic landmark: it anticipated a genre <strong>of</strong> <strong>International</strong><br />

Relations (IR) theory that emerged in the 1940s, the subject <strong>of</strong> which<br />

was international order in the post-war era. Recurrent in all this speculation was<br />

an attempt to come up with new concepts to replace the traditional national state<br />

with something geographically bigger and more powerful. For <strong>Schmitt</strong>, this<br />

concept was <strong>of</strong> course Großraum 1 (<strong>Schmitt</strong> 1991). In <strong>Schmitt</strong>’s Großraumordnung,<br />

the United States, the Soviet Union, and the British and Japanese empires<br />

had their respective Großräume, with Central Europe fast becoming the backyard<br />

<strong>of</strong> the German Reich.<br />

<strong>Schmitt</strong>’s predictions on the future <strong>of</strong> Germany soon proved wide <strong>of</strong> the<br />

mark. Where he did fare better was in foreseeing the political form <strong>of</strong> the emerging<br />

international order. <strong>Schmitt</strong>’s was a geopolitical (or geo-jurisprudential, see<br />

Gyorgy 1943: 682) conceptualisation to mark the end <strong>of</strong> the era <strong>of</strong> international<br />

politics and the beginning <strong>of</strong> that <strong>of</strong> ‘grosspolitics’ (if I may), where the world<br />

political order was ruled by, not territorial states, but ‘hemispheric’ powers. This<br />

order was premised on a de facto repudiation <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> the fundamental norms<br />

<strong>of</strong> state sovereignty laid down in the Treaties <strong>of</strong> Münster and Osnabrück signed<br />

in Westphalia in 1648: equality <strong>of</strong> states in international relations.<br />

<strong>The</strong> purpose <strong>of</strong> this chapter is tw<strong>of</strong>old. First, it discusses the evolution <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Schmitt</strong>’s geopolitics from his Weimar works to his post-1936 writings, from the<br />

state to the Großraum. In his Weimar writings, and especially in his 1932 essay<br />

Der Begriff des Politischen, <strong>Schmitt</strong> developed a historical understanding <strong>of</strong> the<br />

state as the political form <strong>of</strong> the international order <strong>of</strong> Westphalia. In the late<br />

1930s and early 1940s, <strong>Schmitt</strong> articulated the foundations <strong>of</strong> a new order in

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!