20.02.2013 Views

The International Political Thought of Carl Schmitt: Terror, Liberal ...

The International Political Thought of Carl Schmitt: Terror, Liberal ...

The International Political Thought of Carl Schmitt: Terror, Liberal ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

neo-liberal model <strong>of</strong> globalization which is at the origin <strong>of</strong> the proliferation <strong>of</strong><br />

discourses and practices <strong>of</strong> radical negation <strong>of</strong> the established order. In order to<br />

create channels for the legitimate expression <strong>of</strong> dissent we need to envisage a<br />

pluralistic world order constructed around a certain number <strong>of</strong> great spaces and<br />

genuine cultural poles.<br />

<strong>The</strong> new forms <strong>of</strong> terrorism reveal the dangers implicit in the delusions <strong>of</strong> the<br />

universalist globalist discourse which postulates that human progress requires<br />

the establishment <strong>of</strong> world unity based on the adoption <strong>of</strong> the Western model.<br />

This is why, against the illusions <strong>of</strong> the universalist-humanitarians, it is urgent to<br />

listen to <strong>Schmitt</strong> when he reminds us that ‘[t]he political world is a pluriverse,<br />

not a universe’ (<strong>Schmitt</strong> 1976: 53). This is, I believe, the only way to avoid the<br />

‘clash <strong>of</strong> civilizations’ announced by Huntington (1996) and to which, despite<br />

its intentions, the universalist discourse is, in fact, contributing.<br />

Bibliography<br />

<strong>The</strong> dangers <strong>of</strong> a unipolar world 153<br />

Falk, R. and Strauss, A. (2001) ‘Towards global parliament’, Foreign Affairs, 80:<br />

212–220.<br />

—— (2003) ‘<strong>The</strong> deeper challenges <strong>of</strong> global terrorism: a democratizing response’, in D.<br />

Archibugi (ed.) Debating Cosmopolitics, London: Verso.<br />

Huntington, S. P. (1996) <strong>The</strong> Clash <strong>of</strong> Civilizations and the Remaking <strong>of</strong> World Order,<br />

New York: Simon and Schuster.<br />

Kervégan, J.-F. (2002) ‘Ami ou ennemi?’ in ‘La guerre des dieux’, special issue <strong>of</strong> Le<br />

Nouvel Observateur, Hors-serie, January, pp. 34–37.<br />

<strong>Schmitt</strong>, C. (1952) ‘Die Einheit der Welt’, Merkur, 6: 1–11.<br />

—— (1963) <strong>The</strong>orie des Partisanen: Zwischenbemerkung zum Begriff des Politischen,<br />

Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.<br />

—— (1974) Der Nomos der Erde im Völkerrecht des Jus Publicum Europaeum, Berlin:<br />

Duncker & Humblot; trans. G. L. Ulmen (2003) <strong>The</strong> Nomos <strong>of</strong> the Earth in the <strong>International</strong><br />

Law <strong>of</strong> the Jus Publicum Europaeum, New York: Telos Press.<br />

—— (1976) <strong>The</strong> Concept <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Political</strong>, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.<br />

—— (1994 [1932]) ‘Völkerrechtlichen Formen des modernen Imperialismus’, in Positionen<br />

und Begriffe im Kampf mit Weimar – Genf – Versailles 1923–1939, 3rd edn,<br />

Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!