Full page photo print - WSU Puyallup Research and Extension ...
Full page photo print - WSU Puyallup Research and Extension ...
Full page photo print - WSU Puyallup Research and Extension ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Native Plant Synoptic Garden<br />
13<br />
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />
was small, it gives a glimpse into how minor differences in soil texture may affect the water<br />
holding capacity of some soils. Other factors that strongly affect soil moisture levels would be<br />
canopy cover <strong>and</strong> topography of the sampling location. Both of these factors need to be noted<br />
when making comparisons between soil textures, since they could cause soil moisture<br />
measurements to be misinterpreted. To sum it all up, soil moisture retention appears to be good<br />
for plant growth. This can be collaborated by the success of the existing vegetation on site.<br />
Soil pH<br />
The University of Massachusetts (UMASS) soils lab measured the pH two different<br />
ways: soil pH <strong>and</strong> buffer pH. “Buffer pH measures a soils resistance to pH change after lime has<br />
been added” (UMass, 2004), <strong>and</strong> can be dependent on organic matter in the soil as well as the soil<br />
texture (Marschner, 1995). Plants usually prefer a pH between 5.5 <strong>and</strong> 8.3; it is commonly<br />
agreed upon that a soil pH somewhere between 5.5 <strong>and</strong> 6.5 is ideal for many plant, shrub, <strong>and</strong> tree<br />
species (Craul, 1999; Harris et la., 2004; Marschner, 1995). The soil tested from near the Graham<br />
Visitors Center was found to be 6.1 <strong>and</strong> the buffer pH was 6.5. From these results, the lab<br />
recommended no adjustment because the soil pH is within the desired range.<br />
Cation Exchange Capacity<br />
The cation exchange capacity (CEC) was found to be 14.6 Meq/100 grams. A CEC<br />
ranging from 5 Meq/100 grams to 25 Meq/100grams is sufficient for plants (Brady et. la., 2004;<br />
Craul, 1999), although the UMASS suggests that the range of ideal cation exchange capacities<br />
should be between 10 <strong>and</strong> 15 Meq/100 grams (UMASS, 2004). Either way, the CEC level on site<br />
is at an optimal level to promote plant growth. As previously mentioned, the CEC is dependent<br />
on organic matter, <strong>and</strong> the lab at the University of Massachusetts concluded that “The organic<br />
matter level of this soil appears to be quite high”, <strong>and</strong> that “When properly fertilized <strong>and</strong> provided<br />
proper drainage it should provide a good growing medium for woody ornamentals which prefer a<br />
humus rich soil” (UMASS, 2004). This continues to explain why plants already on the site are<br />
doing well.<br />
Macronutrients<br />
As for nutrient levels in the soil, the lab found that there were very high amounts of<br />
calcium <strong>and</strong> magnesium in the soil sampled; this is represented by red in Figure six, <strong>and</strong> listed in<br />
the analysis report in Appendix A. Having high levels of calcium is excellent because calcium is