20.02.2013 Views

Full page photo print - WSU Puyallup Research and Extension ...

Full page photo print - WSU Puyallup Research and Extension ...

Full page photo print - WSU Puyallup Research and Extension ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Native Plant Synoptic Garden<br />

13<br />

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

was small, it gives a glimpse into how minor differences in soil texture may affect the water<br />

holding capacity of some soils. Other factors that strongly affect soil moisture levels would be<br />

canopy cover <strong>and</strong> topography of the sampling location. Both of these factors need to be noted<br />

when making comparisons between soil textures, since they could cause soil moisture<br />

measurements to be misinterpreted. To sum it all up, soil moisture retention appears to be good<br />

for plant growth. This can be collaborated by the success of the existing vegetation on site.<br />

Soil pH<br />

The University of Massachusetts (UMASS) soils lab measured the pH two different<br />

ways: soil pH <strong>and</strong> buffer pH. “Buffer pH measures a soils resistance to pH change after lime has<br />

been added” (UMass, 2004), <strong>and</strong> can be dependent on organic matter in the soil as well as the soil<br />

texture (Marschner, 1995). Plants usually prefer a pH between 5.5 <strong>and</strong> 8.3; it is commonly<br />

agreed upon that a soil pH somewhere between 5.5 <strong>and</strong> 6.5 is ideal for many plant, shrub, <strong>and</strong> tree<br />

species (Craul, 1999; Harris et la., 2004; Marschner, 1995). The soil tested from near the Graham<br />

Visitors Center was found to be 6.1 <strong>and</strong> the buffer pH was 6.5. From these results, the lab<br />

recommended no adjustment because the soil pH is within the desired range.<br />

Cation Exchange Capacity<br />

The cation exchange capacity (CEC) was found to be 14.6 Meq/100 grams. A CEC<br />

ranging from 5 Meq/100 grams to 25 Meq/100grams is sufficient for plants (Brady et. la., 2004;<br />

Craul, 1999), although the UMASS suggests that the range of ideal cation exchange capacities<br />

should be between 10 <strong>and</strong> 15 Meq/100 grams (UMASS, 2004). Either way, the CEC level on site<br />

is at an optimal level to promote plant growth. As previously mentioned, the CEC is dependent<br />

on organic matter, <strong>and</strong> the lab at the University of Massachusetts concluded that “The organic<br />

matter level of this soil appears to be quite high”, <strong>and</strong> that “When properly fertilized <strong>and</strong> provided<br />

proper drainage it should provide a good growing medium for woody ornamentals which prefer a<br />

humus rich soil” (UMASS, 2004). This continues to explain why plants already on the site are<br />

doing well.<br />

Macronutrients<br />

As for nutrient levels in the soil, the lab found that there were very high amounts of<br />

calcium <strong>and</strong> magnesium in the soil sampled; this is represented by red in Figure six, <strong>and</strong> listed in<br />

the analysis report in Appendix A. Having high levels of calcium is excellent because calcium is

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!