19.02.2013 Views

W. Richard Bowen and Nidal Hilal 4

W. Richard Bowen and Nidal Hilal 4

W. Richard Bowen and Nidal Hilal 4

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

68 2. MEASUREMENT OF PARTICLE ANd SURFACE INTERACTIONS<br />

where E s, E f <strong>and</strong> v s, v f are the Young’s modulus <strong>and</strong> Poisson ratios for the<br />

sphere <strong>and</strong> flat surface respectively. The JKR model applies well for large<br />

probes with soft samples <strong>and</strong> large adhesions. For the case of relatively<br />

small tips with surfaces with high Young’s moduli <strong>and</strong> low adhesion, the<br />

DMT model may apply better. For the DMT theory, a slightly different<br />

relationship is found:<br />

a F R W<br />

FAd R W<br />

R R E<br />

DMT<br />

c<br />

p a<br />

� p a �<br />

p<br />

�<br />

2 ( 2π<br />

)<br />

2π<br />

3 2<br />

*<br />

p<br />

2<br />

3<br />

(2.64)<br />

The JKR <strong>and</strong> DMT models are really descriptions of the two ends of a<br />

continuum. Tabor suggested a way of deciding which of these two models<br />

would be the best to apply to a certain situation. From the following<br />

relationship, if the factor � R is greater than unity, then the JKR theory<br />

would be best applied, with DMT being appropriate for � R values less<br />

than unity [153, 154]:<br />

� R<br />

2<br />

a p<br />

0 3<br />

1<br />

⎞ 3<br />

* ⎟<br />

⎛<br />

⎜W<br />

R<br />

� 2. 92 ⎜<br />

⎝⎜<br />

E z ⎠<br />

(2.65)<br />

where � R is effectively the ratio of the elastic deformation due to the applied<br />

load <strong>and</strong> adhesion to the effective range of the surface forces (z 0) [153, 155].<br />

For intermediate systems where values of � R are close to unity, then a treatment<br />

using the Maugis–Dugdale theory is more appropriate [155].<br />

The AFM has been used to measure adhesive forces between particles<br />

<strong>and</strong> process surfaces. One important example is adhesion between particles,<br />

including both inorganic colloidal particles <strong>and</strong> bacterial cells, <strong>and</strong><br />

filtration membranes. This interaction is of great importance when considering<br />

the fouling <strong>and</strong> biofouling of such surfaces. Particles adhere to<br />

the process membranes <strong>and</strong> reduce flow through the membrane, greatly<br />

reducing filtration, the efficiency <strong>and</strong> working lifetime of the membranes.<br />

The process testing of new membranes is potentially expensive <strong>and</strong> time<br />

consuming. The quantification of adhesion forces between colloids <strong>and</strong><br />

membranes can provide an important contribution to developing the<br />

theoretical prediction <strong>and</strong> optimisation <strong>and</strong> control of many engineering<br />

separation processes. As a result, the development of AFM methods to<br />

quantify the adhesion of different materials to membranes of different<br />

compositions can potentially be very useful for membrane manufacturers<br />

<strong>and</strong> engineers [156]. When particle sizes are greater than the pore size<br />

in the absence of repulsive double layer interactions, such particles may<br />

plug the pores very effectively, leading to a catastrophic loss in filtration<br />

flux. Of the many established membrane characterisation techniques,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!