19.02.2013 Views

W. Richard Bowen and Nidal Hilal 4

W. Richard Bowen and Nidal Hilal 4

W. Richard Bowen and Nidal Hilal 4

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2.4 AdHESION FORCES MEASUREd By AFM 67<br />

effect of sphere size <strong>and</strong> probe speed on the contribution of drag on the<br />

AFM cantilever to measured hydrodynamic forces. They found that for<br />

the cantilever used that at speeds of 7.5 �m s �1 <strong>and</strong> for spheres of radii<br />

less than 3 �m, the cantilever did measurably contribute to the observed<br />

effects. Obviously, for faster speeds, the minimum sphere size to prevent<br />

cantilever contributions confounding sphere–plane measurements will<br />

increase. For most operating conditions, the authors recommended using<br />

colloid probes of no less than 5 �m in radius.<br />

2.4 AdHESIon FoRCES MEASuREd by AFM<br />

Adhesive forces measured as the pull-off force in AFM measurements<br />

represent the sum of all the interaction forces occurring in the contact<br />

regime. This includes long-range forces such as van der Waals <strong>and</strong> electrostatic<br />

forces; capillary forces (if measurements are undertaken in air);<br />

solvation forces; hydrophobic interactions <strong>and</strong> steric interactions as well<br />

as any chemical bonding between groups present on the surfaces.<br />

2.4.1 Contact Mechanics <strong>and</strong> Adhesion<br />

The magnitude of the adhesion between two surfaces is dependent<br />

upon the contact area at the junction between the surfaces as well as<br />

the interaction forces themselves. The contact area will depend upon<br />

the mechanical deformation of the materials due to the applied force<br />

<strong>and</strong> material properties. The underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the relationship between<br />

adhesive forces <strong>and</strong> contact mechanics as generally applied in the field of<br />

force microscopy is dependent upon the works of Johnson, Kendal <strong>and</strong><br />

Roberts (JKR theory) [151] <strong>and</strong> Derjaguin, Muller <strong>and</strong> Toporov (DMT<br />

theory) [152] some decades ago. According to the JKR model of contact<br />

mechanics, for a sphere–plane system, the adhesion (pull-off) force can<br />

be related to the work of adhesion, contact area <strong>and</strong> mechanical compliance<br />

of the interacting surfaces by:<br />

JKR 3<br />

ac<br />

2<br />

FAd � πRpWa<br />

�<br />

2<br />

R 3<br />

2<br />

p<br />

6πW<br />

E*<br />

a<br />

(2.62)<br />

where R p is the radius of the probe sphere, W a is the work of adhesion per<br />

unit area <strong>and</strong> a c is the contact radius. The parameter a 2 c/R is the sample<br />

deformation <strong>and</strong> �. E* is the reduced Young’s modulus for the system:<br />

2<br />

1 3 1 1<br />

s<br />

E* 4 Es E f<br />

�<br />

⎛<br />

⎜ � ν � ν<br />

⎜ �<br />

⎜<br />

⎝⎜<br />

2<br />

f<br />

⎞<br />

⎠⎟<br />

(2.63)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!