19.02.2013 Views

W. Richard Bowen and Nidal Hilal 4

W. Richard Bowen and Nidal Hilal 4

W. Richard Bowen and Nidal Hilal 4

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

66 2. MEASUREMENT OF PARTICLE ANd SURFACE INTERACTIONS<br />

2.3.7 Effect of Hydrodynamic drag on AFM Force<br />

Measurements<br />

When performing measurements with particles in liquid, the effects of<br />

hydrodynamic drag on both the particle <strong>and</strong> also the cantilever may be significant,<br />

depending on the velocities at which measurements are taken. In<br />

particular, the effects of confinement of the liquid between two particles or<br />

between two surfaces are important. As the distance between the two surfaces<br />

decreases, the finite drainage time for the confined liquid produces a<br />

force dependent on the separation distance, the velocity of the approach as<br />

well as the viscosity <strong>and</strong> density of the fluid medium. Ignoring any contribution<br />

of drag on the cantilever to this effect, the hydrodynamic force, F H,<br />

for a sphere approaching a plane surface is given by a modified version of<br />

Stoke’s law for the drag force on a sphere [148, 149]:<br />

F � 6πν�r �<br />

H s c<br />

(2.58)<br />

where υ is the velocity of the probe, � is the dynamic viscosity of the<br />

surrounding fluid, r s is the radius of the spherical particle <strong>and</strong> � c is a correction<br />

applied to Stoke’s law to account for the presence of the confining<br />

wall in close proximity.<br />

where<br />

� c<br />

4<br />

� � sinh�<br />

3<br />

∞<br />

∑<br />

c c<br />

n�1<br />

n( n � 1)<br />

( 2n � 1)( 2n � 3)<br />

⎡ 2sinh( 2n � 1) �c<br />

+ ( 2n + 1)<br />

sinh2�<br />

⎤<br />

⎢<br />

c<br />

− 1⎥<br />

⎢ 2 2<br />

⎣⎢<br />

4sinh ( n � 0. 5) �c � ( 2n � 1) sinh2�<br />

⎥<br />

c ⎦⎥<br />

�1<br />

D � rs<br />

D r<br />

� cosh �ln<br />

rs<br />

rs<br />

⎛<br />

⎧<br />

⎞<br />

⎪<br />

⎪⎛<br />

⎞<br />

⎜ ⎨<br />

⎪ ⎜<br />

⎝⎜<br />

⎠⎟<br />

⎪<br />

⎪⎝⎜<br />

⎠⎟<br />

⎩⎪<br />

� s<br />

�<br />

⎡<br />

⎢⎛D<br />

� r ⎞<br />

⎜ s<br />

⎢⎜<br />

⎢⎜⎝<br />

rs<br />

⎠⎟<br />

⎣<br />

2<br />

⎤⎫⎪<br />

⎥<br />

⎪<br />

� 1⎥<br />

⎬<br />

⎪<br />

⎥⎪<br />

⎦⎪<br />

⎭⎪<br />

(2.59)<br />

(2.60)<br />

where D is the distance between the plane surface <strong>and</strong> closest point of the<br />

sphere. For measurements where r � �h, then this can be simplified to:<br />

F<br />

H<br />

rs<br />

�<br />

D<br />

6πν�<br />

2<br />

(2.61)<br />

In most cases, contributions due to interactions between the surface<br />

<strong>and</strong> the cantilever itself can be neglected. However, depending on the<br />

size of the colloid probe <strong>and</strong> the speed at which the experiment is carried<br />

out, this may not always be the case. Vinogradova et al. [150] studied the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!