19.02.2013 Views

W. Richard Bowen and Nidal Hilal 4

W. Richard Bowen and Nidal Hilal 4

W. Richard Bowen and Nidal Hilal 4

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

60 2. MEASUREMENT OF PARTICLE ANd SURFACE INTERACTIONS<br />

A repulsive force dominant at short ranges between silica surfaces in<br />

aqueous solutions of NaCl has been reported by Grabbe <strong>and</strong> Horn [101],<br />

which was also found to be independent of electrolyte concentration over<br />

the range investigated. They attributed this force to a hydration repulsion<br />

resulting from hydrogen bonding of water to the silica surface, <strong>and</strong> fitted<br />

the additional component to a sum of two exponentials to work out the<br />

formula for the hydration forces in the system.<br />

The physical mechanisms underlying the hydration force are still a<br />

matter for debate. One possible mechanism is the anomalous polarisation<br />

of water near the interfaces, which completely alters its dielectric<br />

response [102–104]. These theories imply an electrostatic origin of the<br />

hydration force. However, other authors report [105] that there is no<br />

evidence for a significant structuring of water layers near interfaces, or<br />

a perturbation of its dielectric response, as envisaged by previous theories.<br />

Instead, they suggest that the repulsive forces are due to entropic<br />

(osmotic) repulsion of thermally excited molecular groups that protrude<br />

from the surfaces [106]. This theory explains many experimental observations<br />

in neutral systems [107], but its validity in charged systems is not<br />

certain. Given the available evidence from experiments <strong>and</strong> simulations,<br />

it is not possible to reach a definitive conclusion on the precise role of<br />

these mechanisms in determining the hydration forces. Until recently,<br />

computer simulations of water films coated with ionic surfactants<br />

showed that protrusions are not significant in these systems [108]. On<br />

the other h<strong>and</strong>, computer simulations show that water has an anomalous<br />

dielectric behaviour near charged interfaces [109], but the observed electrostatic<br />

fields obviously differ from the predictions of electrostatic theories<br />

on hydration forces [103, 110]. The effect of this anomalous dielectric<br />

behaviour of water on the electrostatic force between surfaces or interfaces<br />

is still unknown.<br />

The use of AFM to measure solvation forces between surfaces has been<br />

of some interest amongst researchers in recent years for the purposes of<br />

both studying the phenomena between closely interacting probes <strong>and</strong><br />

surfaces that may cause artefacts when imaging with an AFM <strong>and</strong> investigating<br />

the effect of these solvation forces on the interactions between<br />

colloidal particles. O’Shea <strong>and</strong> colleagues [111] observed an oscillatory<br />

force on close approach of a sharp AFM probe to a graphite surface in<br />

water, octamethylcyclotetra siloxane (OMCTS), <strong>and</strong> dodecanol. A series<br />

of repulsive barriers were observed as approach was made for OMCTS<br />

<strong>and</strong> dodecanol, with each repulsive barrier becoming successively larger,<br />

owing to the closer-bound solvation layers becoming harder to displace.<br />

The authors calculated that the energy required to remove the solvation<br />

molecules was 5–25 times kT for OMCTS <strong>and</strong> 5–1000 times kT for<br />

dodecanol, suggesting that only a small number of molecules were being<br />

displaced. In addition, it was noted that the distance between successive

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!