19.02.2013 Views

W. Richard Bowen and Nidal Hilal 4

W. Richard Bowen and Nidal Hilal 4

W. Richard Bowen and Nidal Hilal 4

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

of the force curve. Researchers have overcome this problem by the use<br />

of magnetically actuated cantilevers operating under a feedback mechanism<br />

to maintain the stability of the system [20].<br />

Butt et al., in a comprehensive review of force measurement techniques<br />

[21], describe a method for calculating the Hamaker constant from both the<br />

jump-in distance <strong>and</strong> the deflection of the cantilever due to the jump-in. This<br />

requires knowledge of the radius of curvature of the probe tip (or spherical<br />

particle replacing the probe) along with the effective stiffness of both the<br />

cantilever <strong>and</strong> total system. For a sphere approaching a plane surface,<br />

A<br />

H<br />

2.3 INTERACTION FORCES 43<br />

3<br />

jtc<br />

3<br />

kc<br />

⎟ keff<br />

2<br />

3k D ⎛<br />

eff jtc 2k ⎞<br />

⎜ 3k x<br />

C eff 24<br />

� � ⎜ �<br />

Rt<br />

⎝⎜<br />

keff<br />

⎠ Rt<br />

Rt<br />

(2.22)<br />

where D jtc is the jump-in distance, x jtc is the cantilever deflection due to<br />

the jump-in, R t is the radius of curvature of the probe tip, k c is the spring<br />

constant of the cantilever <strong>and</strong> k eff is the effective spring constant of the<br />

cantilever-sample system. The effective stiffness can be calculated from<br />

considering the contribution to the stiffness of the system of the cantilever<br />

<strong>and</strong> sample surface interacting in series:<br />

1 1 1<br />

� �<br />

keff kc ks<br />

(2.23)<br />

where k s is the stiffness of the sample, assuming negligible deformation<br />

of the probe. For hard samples or soft cantilevers, k eff � k c. Das <strong>and</strong> colleagues<br />

[22] used a similar approach to measure the Hamaker constant<br />

between silicon nitride AFM probes <strong>and</strong> a number of surfaces from the<br />

jump-in distance using the following relationship:<br />

A<br />

H<br />

k D<br />

�<br />

R<br />

24⎛<br />

⎜<br />

27⎝⎜<br />

c jtc<br />

t<br />

⎞<br />

⎠⎟<br />

(2.24)<br />

Measurements were carried out on a SiO 2 surface, freshly cleaved<br />

mica <strong>and</strong> on a silver metal film in air under ambient conditions. Values<br />

obtained were of the same magnitude, but not identical, to literature values<br />

obtained from Lifshitz theory <strong>and</strong> measurements with the surface<br />

forces apparatus (SFA). One possible reason for this divergence may be<br />

the presence of a contaminating water layer present on most surfaces<br />

under ambient conditions.<br />

The Hamaker constant for an interaction may also be calculated from the<br />

work of adhesion, W a, between the two bodies. The work of adhesion may<br />

be obtained from the adhesion as measured during the retract cycle of a force<br />

distance measurement <strong>and</strong> then applying the appropriate contact mechanics

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!