19.02.2013 Views

W. Richard Bowen and Nidal Hilal 4

W. Richard Bowen and Nidal Hilal 4

W. Richard Bowen and Nidal Hilal 4

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

l<br />

1.6 CALIBRATION OF AFM MICROCANTILEvERs 7<br />

where k m is the uncorrected calculated spring constant value, k c the corrected<br />

value <strong>and</strong> �l the distance of the centre of the base of the probe<br />

from the apex of the lever.<br />

The problem with calculating spring constants purely from the measured<br />

dimensions of the lever <strong>and</strong> nominal values for the Young’s modulus is primarily<br />

that during cantilever manufacture variability in the material properties,<br />

particularly the Young’s modulus, of cantilevers can occur largely due<br />

to variations in the morphology of the silicon nitride [23]. In addition, accurate<br />

determination of lever thickness is not always very practicable. Making<br />

accurate measurements for every lever used in experiments by SEM is time<br />

consuming <strong>and</strong> not necessarily convenient. By measuring the resonance<br />

behaviour of cantilevers, variability in the material properties of the cantilevers<br />

can be at least to some extent taken into account. This leads to a more<br />

reliable calculation for the spring constant of a cantilever surrounded by a<br />

fluid environment, such as air, from the following relationship [99, 100]:<br />

2 2<br />

f i f f<br />

k � 0. 1906�<br />

b lQΓ<br />

( � ) �<br />

(1.5)<br />

where � f is the density of the surrounding fluid; Q the quality factor (a<br />

measure of the sharpness of the resonance peak); � i the imaginary component<br />

of the hydrodynamic function, dependent upon the Reynolds<br />

number of the fluid; <strong>and</strong> � f the fundamental resonance frequency of the<br />

cantilever. Although this approach is reliable for calibrating rectangular<br />

levers, there are not currently any reliable approximations to allow this<br />

method to be used for the commonly used V-shaped cantilevers.<br />

Another method, developed by Clevel<strong>and</strong> et al. [95], requires the<br />

attachment of known masses, such as tungsten spheres, to the end of the<br />

cantilever whilst monitoring the resultant resonant frequency change.<br />

Measuring the position of the fundamental resonance peak of the<br />

cantilever before <strong>and</strong> after the addition of the sphere allows the following<br />

relationship to be used to calculate the spring constant:<br />

2 M<br />

k � ( 2π<br />

) (1.6)<br />

( 1/ v ) � ( 1/<br />

v )<br />

1 2<br />

w<br />

0 2<br />

t<br />

fIgure .5 Diagram<br />

showing relevant dimensions<br />

on a beam-shaped<br />

AFM cantilever.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!