19.02.2013 Views

W. Richard Bowen and Nidal Hilal 4

W. Richard Bowen and Nidal Hilal 4

W. Richard Bowen and Nidal Hilal 4

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1.5 THE AFM As A FORCE sENsOR 5<br />

consequence, the slope obtained from contact with an unyielding surface<br />

provides the sensitivity of the optical lever system. By dividing the raw<br />

deflection data by this sensitivity value, it can be converted into an actual<br />

deflection distance. This sensitivity value is essential for the calculation<br />

of force values from raw deflection data. This deflection value (distance)<br />

can also then be subtracted from the z-piezo displacement to give the<br />

actual distance travelled by the probe. An alternative method of finding<br />

the optical lever sensitivity without needing to make hard contact with<br />

the surface was suggested by Higgins et al. [94] (Section 1.4).<br />

Within operational limits the AFM cantilever behaves as a linear, or<br />

‘Hookean’, spring. As a result the magnitude of the deflection of the cantilever<br />

can be used to calculate the force which is exerted on the cantilever<br />

using Hooke’s law:<br />

F � � kx<br />

(1.1)<br />

where F is force (N), x the deflection of the cantilever (m) <strong>and</strong> k the spring<br />

(or force) constant of the cantilever (N m �1 ), which essentially represents<br />

the stiffness of the cantilever. This spring constant is dependent upon the<br />

physical properties of the lever. This is apparent from the following relation,<br />

used to describe a rectangular, ‘diving board’ shaped lever as shown<br />

in 1. 5 [16, 95]:<br />

3<br />

Et w<br />

k � 3<br />

4l<br />

(1.2)<br />

where E is the Young’s modulus of the lever <strong>and</strong> t, w <strong>and</strong> l the thickness,<br />

width <strong>and</strong> length of the lever, respectively. However, it must be borne in<br />

mind that none of the diving board levers are perfectly rectangular, due<br />

to shaping of the ends of the beams <strong>and</strong> imperfections in the manufacturing<br />

process. As a result this equation will give only an approximate value<br />

for the stiffness of a rectangular cantilever. In the next section the need<br />

for the methods used to effectively measure the stiffness of a cantilever<br />

to be used for force measurements, whether it is rectangular or V-shaped,<br />

<strong>and</strong> the reasons for variability in k between cantilevers are addressed in<br />

greater detail.<br />

For different applications, cantilevers with different spring constants<br />

may be needed. For instance, for intermittent contact mode in air, particularly<br />

stiff levers are needed to overcome capillary forces, whereas for<br />

measurement of weak interaction forces, very soft levers are needed for<br />

their increased force sensitivity. The most convenient ways of producing<br />

this variation are by altering the length <strong>and</strong> or thickness of levers during<br />

production in order to increase or decrease the lever stiffness.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!