19.02.2013 Views

W. Richard Bowen and Nidal Hilal 4

W. Richard Bowen and Nidal Hilal 4

W. Richard Bowen and Nidal Hilal 4

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

7.4 CONCLUSIONS 217<br />

In using simple Hertz-based models, it is important to realise that they<br />

may be valid only for small indentations, in the region of 5–10% of the total<br />

sample depth. In the case of cells, this will result in the first 200–500 nm<br />

of indentation giving a valid fit, but at deeper indentations the underlying<br />

substrate will start to influence the data. To overcome this problem, there<br />

has been some work on models that can accommodate indentation deeper<br />

than 10% of the total sample thickness [80], although currently they are not<br />

as well established as the conventional Hertz model.<br />

Other considerations that should be taken into account when measuring<br />

the mechanical properties of cells include the inhomogeneity <strong>and</strong> non-elastic<br />

nature of a cell. For example, the indentation of cell nucleus <strong>and</strong> filopodia<br />

is quite different as shown in Figure 7.10(b). Although it is assumed<br />

that the cell is truly elastic for the purpose of data analysis, some of the<br />

energy delivered during indentation will be dissipated due to the viscous<br />

<strong>and</strong> slightly plastic nature of a cell. This effect can be seen in the velocity-<br />

dependent hysteresis that can be observed in some experiments [78, 81].<br />

Measurements may also vary between cells, or even on the same cell due<br />

to the internal components of cell moving beneath the indenting tip.<br />

Since Tao et al. first utilised AFM for quantitative measurement of local<br />

elastic properties of a biological sample (cow tibia) [82], there has been<br />

significant growth in the use of AFM for elasticity measurements of living<br />

cells [83–86]. It has been found that the elasticity (or stiffness) of different<br />

cell types can vary from 0.1 to 40 kPa [87], <strong>and</strong> cell elasticity might<br />

function as a quantitative indicator during cell differentiation. Many studies<br />

have also shown that cancer cells are substantially softer than normal<br />

cells [88, 89], indicating that quantitative analysis of mechanical properties<br />

could be used to differentiate between cancerous <strong>and</strong> normal cells<br />

with similar appearances. The quantitative information of local cell elasticity<br />

in nanoscale spatial resolution has also provided valuable insights<br />

into cellular processes such as cell spreading [90] <strong>and</strong> cell migration [91].<br />

Monitoring the change in elasticity while treating cells with drugs that<br />

disrupt specific cytoskeletal structures (i.e. F-actin, tubulin <strong>and</strong> intermediate<br />

filaments) reveals that the actin network mainly determines the elastic<br />

properties of living cells [66]. Apart from the continuous contribution to<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing fundamental cellular mechanisms, these developments are<br />

also promising for drug testing studies [92].<br />

7.4 ConCluSIonS<br />

Recent developments in micro- <strong>and</strong> nanoengineering have created<br />

many opportunities to investigate the complex processes in cellular biology.<br />

Engineered surfaces with micro- or nanoscale features, either chemical

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!