W. Richard Bowen and Nidal Hilal 4
W. Richard Bowen and Nidal Hilal 4
W. Richard Bowen and Nidal Hilal 4
- No tags were found...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
6.2 THE AfM AS A fORCE MEASUREMENT TOOL IN PHARMACEUTICALS 175<br />
fundamental forces involved (e.g. van der Waals, electrostatic, capillary).<br />
Access to such information is beneficial not only to the assessment of a<br />
formulation, but also to establish the basis of any required particle modification<br />
<strong>and</strong> optimisation.<br />
Just as particle interactions can be probed using AFM, the nanoscale<br />
mechanical properties of powders can also be investigated. Previously,<br />
this could only be derived from bulk techniques, where powders are<br />
compressed into miniature beams <strong>and</strong> three-point bending tests are<br />
performed. The need for relatively large amounts of powder <strong>and</strong> to<br />
account for the porosity of the beams has limited the applicability of this<br />
approach. Even using miniaturised beams, milligram quantities of material<br />
are required, preventing screening of active pharmaceutical ingredients<br />
at early stages of development [9, 10]. Here, we consider how AFM<br />
has been used to address both particle interactions <strong>and</strong> the measurement<br />
of the mechanical properties from single particles.<br />
6.2.1 Particle Interaction Measurements<br />
The ability to study single-particle interactions <strong>and</strong> the forces involved<br />
became possible with the advent of the AFM in 1986 [11–13]. In particular,<br />
the use of AFM in the so-called ‘colloidal probe’ technique, whereby<br />
the force of interaction between a spherical bead attached to the AFM<br />
cantilever <strong>and</strong> a planar surface was studied, revealed the potential of this<br />
approach [14]. Importantly, a single particle (e.g. drug) attached to the<br />
AFM cantilever can be used for a series of comparative experiments challenging<br />
different substrates. In addition, the ability of AFM to work in a<br />
variety of environments, such as controlled humidity <strong>and</strong> in liquids, is<br />
significant for pharmaceutical applications.<br />
The first example of this approach being used for a pharmaceutical<br />
powder examined the differences in the adhesion of lactose particles to<br />
two gelatin DPI capsule surfaces [15]. It is important when attaching<br />
such individual drug particles to an AFM cantilever that their contacting<br />
region remains free from any adhesives employed or damage during<br />
attachment. An example scanning electron microscope (SEM) image is<br />
shown in Figure 6.1, where a drug particle is attached to an AFM cantilever.<br />
Typically, to prepare such a probe would involve the use of a minute<br />
amount of glue on the end of the cantilever to which a particle is attached<br />
using a micromanipulator or the AFM itself. This relatively labourintensive<br />
sample preparation currently limits the number of different<br />
particles used within one study (usually to no more than five). The accessible<br />
particle size is typically in the range between 0.5 �m <strong>and</strong> 50 �m. For<br />
very small <strong>and</strong>/or cohesive particles (1 �m or less), more than one may<br />
become attached to the lever; however, as long as only one comes into<br />
contact with the surface to be challenged, this is acceptable.