19.02.2013 Views

W. Richard Bowen and Nidal Hilal 4

W. Richard Bowen and Nidal Hilal 4

W. Richard Bowen and Nidal Hilal 4

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

8 1. BAsIC PRINCIPLEs OF ATOMIC FORCE MICROsCOPy<br />

shape of the probe is of fundamental importance in determining those<br />

interactions. In addition to the radius of curvature at the apex of the<br />

probe, the geometry of all of the parts of the probe which can interact<br />

with the sample are of great importance, particularly when imaging or<br />

performing indentation measurements.<br />

When imaging a sample surface, features of greatly varying geometry<br />

may be encountered. The ability to resolve these features depends<br />

upon both the sharpness of the probe tip <strong>and</strong> the aspect ratio of the<br />

probe. First, the probe sample contact area is a limit to AFM resolution.<br />

This is dependent not just upon the sharpness of the probe tip,<br />

but also upon the force with which the probe presses into the surface<br />

<strong>and</strong> the consequent mechanical deformations induced in the probe<br />

<strong>and</strong> sample. As the sample is deformed, the probe tip will become<br />

indented into the sample <strong>and</strong> a greater part of the probe surface will be in<br />

direct contact with the sample. Conversely if it presses against a hard<br />

sample with sufficient force, the probe itself may become deformed,<br />

similarly contributing to an increased interaction area. This interaction<br />

will be dependent upon the shape of the probe as well as purely on the<br />

radius of curvature found at the apex. Features present upon the surface<br />

which are smaller in size than the contact area will be unable to be<br />

successfully resolved.<br />

When asperities, which are sharper than the probe, on the surface are<br />

encountered, the image of the feature which is obtained will be based<br />

more upon the shape of the probe than upon the surface feature [51, 52]<br />

due to convolution effects. This is a problem potentially arising in all<br />

forms of SPM. This may be commonly observed when low aspect ratio<br />

probes are scanned over surfaces with high aspect ratio asperities. In<br />

effect the probe is imaged by the surface. A similar effect may be seen<br />

when the probe encounters a step edge on the sample, which is steeper<br />

than the side of the probe. In this case a broadening effect will occur<br />

where the feature under observation will appear to be wider than it actually<br />

is. These convolution effects serve to produce images which rather<br />

than being true representations of sample topography represent a composite<br />

of the topographies of both sample <strong>and</strong> probe. The finer the tip<br />

<strong>and</strong> higher the aspect ratio of the probe, will provide images which are<br />

a truer representation of the real topography of the sample.<br />

.4 ImagIng modes<br />

There are many different imaging modes available for the AFM, providing<br />

a range of different information about the sample surfaces being<br />

examined. However, for simplicity the most common modes will be<br />

considered here. In Figure 1.3 the force regimes under which the main

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!