19.02.2013 Views

W. Richard Bowen and Nidal Hilal 4

W. Richard Bowen and Nidal Hilal 4

W. Richard Bowen and Nidal Hilal 4

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

5.4 MODIFICATION OF MEMBRANEs wITH sULPHONATED 165<br />

FIR/mN m –1<br />

(a)<br />

FIR/mN m –1<br />

(b)<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

–1<br />

5<br />

0<br />

–5<br />

–10<br />

–15<br />

–20<br />

–25<br />

–30<br />

0 20 40 60<br />

Distance/nm<br />

–2<br />

0<br />

Approach<br />

Retraction<br />

20<br />

Distance/nm<br />

Approach<br />

Retraction<br />

fIgurE 5.22 Example normalised force versus distance curves against (a) P-P type<br />

membrane <strong>and</strong> (b) S5-20 membrane.<br />

of the membrane. When the probe is retracted away from the membrane<br />

surface, a large attractive force is again measured. The difference between<br />

the attractive force at its greatest magnitude <strong>and</strong> the force measured when<br />

the probe has no net forces acting upon it (its free level) is the measured<br />

adhesion force, F off. In contrast, for the S5-20 SPEEK membrane, no snapin<br />

is observed. This is most likely due to the silica probe <strong>and</strong> membrane<br />

surface carrying charges which are identical in sign. When the particle<br />

is retracted, only a moderate adhesive force was measured. Data for the<br />

40<br />

60

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!