19.02.2013 Views

W. Richard Bowen and Nidal Hilal 4

W. Richard Bowen and Nidal Hilal 4

W. Richard Bowen and Nidal Hilal 4

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

also increase the effective area of contact, further decreasing the resolution<br />

of images. The presence of a contaminant layer can also adversely affect<br />

any attempt to chemically functionalise probes, preventing formation of<br />

an even layer of the desired coating material. There are various methods<br />

available to successfully clean AFM probes, which will now be described.<br />

Technologically, the simplest method is chemical cleaning by immersing<br />

the probe in an acid peroxide solution – most commonly a mixture<br />

referred to as piranha solution (usually a 7:3 ratio by volume of concentrated<br />

H 2SO 4 <strong>and</strong> 30% v/v H 2O 2, although the proportions may vary<br />

between laboratories) for a short period of time, which has been verified<br />

as effective in removing organic surface contaminants <strong>and</strong> increasing the<br />

hydrophilicity of the levers, although inorganic contaminants are not<br />

affected [42, 43]. This mixture is used in the semiconductor industry to<br />

clean photoresist <strong>and</strong> other contaminants from silicon wafers [44]. Simple<br />

cleaning by rinsing with organic solvents is insufficient to remove all the<br />

organic contaminants [43]. Piranha solution is extremely reactive with any<br />

organic material <strong>and</strong> can remove contaminants from levers <strong>and</strong> silicon<br />

surfaces in a very short space, with necessary exposure times to remove<br />

contaminants from AFM probes, which is typically less than 1 min.<br />

However, for this reason it is very corrosive if it comes into contact with<br />

any biological material including skin <strong>and</strong> must be h<strong>and</strong>led with great<br />

care by the user. In addition if it comes into contact with a relatively large<br />

quantity of organic material, such as by allowing to mix with organic solvents,<br />

the mixture may become explosive, posing a significant danger to<br />

laboratory users, with accounts of such laboratory accidents extant in the<br />

literature [45, 46]. As such, this method is not recommended if other safer<br />

cleaning methods are available <strong>and</strong> only small volumes should be produced<br />

at a time as <strong>and</strong> when required. Another commonly used method<br />

to clean AFM probes is to use ultraviolet (UV) light [47, 48]. This works<br />

by converting oxygen to form small amounts of ozone, which is then further<br />

broken down to produce highly reactive singlet oxygen, which in<br />

turn reacts with organic contaminant materials on the surfaces. For greater<br />

effectiveness, such a system is often combined with an independent ozone<br />

source to increase the amount of singlet oxygen radicals produced. Many<br />

laboratories also use plasma ashing or etching processes to remove contaminants<br />

from probes <strong>and</strong> samples [41, 42, 48–50], which has been demonstrated<br />

to be particularly effective in the removal of thin layers of organic<br />

contamination. Here a process gas, usually oxygen or argon, is ionised<br />

under a partial vacuum in a chamber containing the sample to be cleaned.<br />

.3. effect of probe geometry<br />

1.3 CANTILEvERs ANd PROBEs 7<br />

Because all measurements made using an AFM are based upon the<br />

physical interaction between the probe <strong>and</strong> the sample, it follows that the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!