W. Richard Bowen and Nidal Hilal 4
W. Richard Bowen and Nidal Hilal 4
W. Richard Bowen and Nidal Hilal 4
- No tags were found...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
also increase the effective area of contact, further decreasing the resolution<br />
of images. The presence of a contaminant layer can also adversely affect<br />
any attempt to chemically functionalise probes, preventing formation of<br />
an even layer of the desired coating material. There are various methods<br />
available to successfully clean AFM probes, which will now be described.<br />
Technologically, the simplest method is chemical cleaning by immersing<br />
the probe in an acid peroxide solution – most commonly a mixture<br />
referred to as piranha solution (usually a 7:3 ratio by volume of concentrated<br />
H 2SO 4 <strong>and</strong> 30% v/v H 2O 2, although the proportions may vary<br />
between laboratories) for a short period of time, which has been verified<br />
as effective in removing organic surface contaminants <strong>and</strong> increasing the<br />
hydrophilicity of the levers, although inorganic contaminants are not<br />
affected [42, 43]. This mixture is used in the semiconductor industry to<br />
clean photoresist <strong>and</strong> other contaminants from silicon wafers [44]. Simple<br />
cleaning by rinsing with organic solvents is insufficient to remove all the<br />
organic contaminants [43]. Piranha solution is extremely reactive with any<br />
organic material <strong>and</strong> can remove contaminants from levers <strong>and</strong> silicon<br />
surfaces in a very short space, with necessary exposure times to remove<br />
contaminants from AFM probes, which is typically less than 1 min.<br />
However, for this reason it is very corrosive if it comes into contact with<br />
any biological material including skin <strong>and</strong> must be h<strong>and</strong>led with great<br />
care by the user. In addition if it comes into contact with a relatively large<br />
quantity of organic material, such as by allowing to mix with organic solvents,<br />
the mixture may become explosive, posing a significant danger to<br />
laboratory users, with accounts of such laboratory accidents extant in the<br />
literature [45, 46]. As such, this method is not recommended if other safer<br />
cleaning methods are available <strong>and</strong> only small volumes should be produced<br />
at a time as <strong>and</strong> when required. Another commonly used method<br />
to clean AFM probes is to use ultraviolet (UV) light [47, 48]. This works<br />
by converting oxygen to form small amounts of ozone, which is then further<br />
broken down to produce highly reactive singlet oxygen, which in<br />
turn reacts with organic contaminant materials on the surfaces. For greater<br />
effectiveness, such a system is often combined with an independent ozone<br />
source to increase the amount of singlet oxygen radicals produced. Many<br />
laboratories also use plasma ashing or etching processes to remove contaminants<br />
from probes <strong>and</strong> samples [41, 42, 48–50], which has been demonstrated<br />
to be particularly effective in the removal of thin layers of organic<br />
contamination. Here a process gas, usually oxygen or argon, is ionised<br />
under a partial vacuum in a chamber containing the sample to be cleaned.<br />
.3. effect of probe geometry<br />
1.3 CANTILEvERs ANd PROBEs 7<br />
Because all measurements made using an AFM are based upon the<br />
physical interaction between the probe <strong>and</strong> the sample, it follows that the