19.02.2013 Views

W. Richard Bowen and Nidal Hilal 4

W. Richard Bowen and Nidal Hilal 4

W. Richard Bowen and Nidal Hilal 4

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

At pH 5.5, dissolution began to occur, but only at the step edges, not in the<br />

centre of the crystal planes. At pH values below this, as the pH decreased<br />

the dissolution rate increased, with a significant change in behaviour<br />

occurring below pH 4.0. Below this value, dissolution also began to occur<br />

at the flat crystal surfaces, although it was still most pronounced at the<br />

edges. It was suggested that this behaviour was due to the presence of<br />

oxygen in the step edges, which would be much more prone to attack by<br />

solution protons than the flat surfaces, which are positively charged at the<br />

higher pH values.<br />

A number of other studies have used AFM alongside other techniques<br />

to characterise a number of different coatings to protect metal surfaces<br />

from corrosion <strong>and</strong> wear, including TiN <strong>and</strong> ZrN thin films [24]; Sn–Ni<br />

<strong>and</strong> Sn–Cu alloy coatings [25, 26]; CrN films for enhanced wear resistance<br />

[27] <strong>and</strong> zirconia-based primers as coatings on aluminium [28].<br />

4.8.3 biofilms at Metal Surfaces<br />

4.9 CONCLUsIONs 135<br />

Yu <strong>and</strong> colleagues [29] examined the difference between nano- <strong>and</strong><br />

microcrystallization of stainless steel surfaces <strong>and</strong> the effect on the adhesion<br />

of biofilms. Using an AFM tip coated in a synthetic peptide to simulate<br />

a biofilm, adhesion measurements were made against nanocrystalline<br />

<strong>and</strong> microcrystalline surfaces. It was found that the measured adhesion<br />

in air was significantly reduced for the nanocrystalline surface compared<br />

with the microscrystalline surface. These observations were matched by<br />

similar results from the observations of attachment of whole bacterial<br />

cells to the same surfaces in bulk solution.<br />

4.9 COnCLUSIOnS<br />

The many benefits of AFM in investigations of membranes <strong>and</strong> membrane<br />

processes may be summarised as:<br />

1. Atomic force microscopy can determine the key properties of synthetic<br />

membranes: pore size distribution, surface morphology <strong>and</strong><br />

surface roughness, surface electrical properties <strong>and</strong> surface adhesion.<br />

2. Correspondence between surface pore dimensions from AFM <strong>and</strong><br />

MWCO is good. In addition, AFM gives surface pore size distribution.<br />

3. Operations in liquid <strong>and</strong> colloid probe techniques are particular<br />

advantages of AFM.<br />

4. AFM can establish the effects of changes in interactions over the surface<br />

of membranes, e.g. due to local morphology.<br />

5. AFM allows the visualisation of solute/membrane interactions.<br />

6. AFM is a very useful asset in assessing the properties of membranes<br />

during their development.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!