19.02.2013 Views

W. Richard Bowen and Nidal Hilal 4

W. Richard Bowen and Nidal Hilal 4

W. Richard Bowen and Nidal Hilal 4

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4.8 CHARACTERIsATION OF METAL sURFACEs 129<br />

TAbLE 4.6 surface Characteristics Obtained from AFM Images.<br />

Surface Area Ra (nm) RMS (nm) Average height (nm) Maximum range (nm)<br />

(a) 38.3 49.5 361.1 726.6<br />

(b) 124.3 170.1 785.4 1407.5<br />

FIgURE 4.24 SEM image of a CaCO 3 crystal mounted as a probe on the apex of an<br />

AFM cantilever.<br />

images. Table 4.6 shows surface characteristics obtained from such<br />

AFM images.<br />

The differences in the roughness average (Ra) <strong>and</strong> root mean square<br />

roughness (RMS) show that the statistical variation in height of the<br />

individual points in each image becomes greater from sample (a) to (c),<br />

whilst the average height <strong>and</strong> maximum range show that the magnitude<br />

of the variations in height, <strong>and</strong> hence size, of the surface features is much<br />

greater from sample (a) to (c).<br />

Adhesion measurements were taken with a CaCO 3 crystal, Figure 4.24,<br />

at five different points on the sample surface, with a total of approximately<br />

100 measurements per sample, <strong>and</strong> mean adhesion values were calculated.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!