19.02.2013 Views

W. Richard Bowen and Nidal Hilal 4

W. Richard Bowen and Nidal Hilal 4

W. Richard Bowen and Nidal Hilal 4

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

122 4. INvEsTIgATINg MEMbRANEs ANd MEMbRANE PROCEssEs<br />

The adhesion of the colloid probe is markedly lower at the peaks on<br />

the membrane surface than in the valleys, with the difference increasing<br />

with decreasing salt concentration, <strong>and</strong> reaching a factor of more than 20<br />

in 10 �3 M solution. The wide variation in interactions shows that theoretical<br />

descriptions of membrane fouling need to take surface morphology<br />

into explicit account. Further, the results show that the selection of membranes<br />

for the filtration of specific process streams would benefit from an<br />

assessment of the size of likely foulants <strong>and</strong> the membrane roughness,<br />

especially the periodicity of the roughness. Fouling could be minimised<br />

F/R / mN/m<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

–2<br />

–4<br />

–6<br />

Peak<br />

Valley<br />

–8<br />

0 50 100 150<br />

Separation distance / nm<br />

FIgURE 4.16 Adhesion of a silica colloid probe at a peak <strong>and</strong> a valley on an AFC99<br />

membrane in 10 �3 M NaCl solution (pull-off force).<br />

TAbLE 4.4 Normalised Adhesion Forces for silica Colloid Probes <strong>and</strong> AFC99<br />

Membrane.<br />

Surface type [NaCl] (M) F/R (mN/m)<br />

Membrane peak 10 �3 �0.3 (�0.17)<br />

10 �2 �1.4 (�0.43)<br />

10 �1 �2.3 (�0.48)<br />

Membrane valley 10 �3 �6.5 (�2.2)<br />

10 �2 �8.1 (�3.5)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!