19.02.2013 Views

W. Richard Bowen and Nidal Hilal 4

W. Richard Bowen and Nidal Hilal 4

W. Richard Bowen and Nidal Hilal 4

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

116 4. INvEsTIgATINg MEMbRANEs ANd MEMbRANE PROCEssEs<br />

Fraction of pores counted<br />

0.16<br />

0.14<br />

0.12<br />

0.10<br />

0.08<br />

0.06<br />

0.04<br />

0.02<br />

AFM distribution<br />

Theoretical distribution<br />

0.00<br />

0.00<br />

2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0<br />

Pore diameter/nm<br />

FIgURE 4.9 AFM pore size distribution for Desal GM membrane <strong>and</strong> theoretical lognormal<br />

distribution.<br />

4.4 IMAgIng In LIqUID AnD ThE DETERMInATIOn OF<br />

SURFACE ELECTRICAL PROPERTIES<br />

For membranes that are used in liquid systems, it is very useful to<br />

have the possibility of imaging in a solution corresponding to the processing<br />

conditions of pH <strong>and</strong> ionic content. An Atomic Force Microscope<br />

gives great control of imaging protocols, allowing investigation of the<br />

procedures that give the best membrane images, in particular the imaging<br />

force. Figure 4.10 shows the force of interaction between an AFM tip<br />

<strong>and</strong> a Cyclopore membrane of specified pore diameter 0.1 �m in solutions<br />

at constant pH but varying ionic strength [6].<br />

It may be seen that the range of the interaction increases greatly as the<br />

ionic strength decreases in accordance with electrical double layer theory. It<br />

is then possible to image the membrane using a force at any point on the<br />

curves in Figure 4.10. Two series of such images, one at various forces at<br />

constant ionic strength <strong>and</strong> the other at approximately constant force at various<br />

ionic strengths, are shown in Figure 4.11. It may be seen that the quality<br />

of the images improves with increasing imaging force <strong>and</strong> with increasing<br />

ionic strength. The derived pore diameter distributions also vary with the<br />

imaging conditions, as shown in the corresponding graphs in Figure 4.11 [7].<br />

The reason for this variation may be understood from Figure 4.12,<br />

which shows calculated isopotential lines for a 10 �1 M solution <strong>and</strong> a<br />

10 �4 M solution, respectively.<br />

0.16<br />

0.14<br />

0.12<br />

0.10<br />

0.08<br />

0.06<br />

0.04<br />

0.02<br />

Probability density function fR(r)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!