19.02.2013 Views

W. Richard Bowen and Nidal Hilal 4

W. Richard Bowen and Nidal Hilal 4

W. Richard Bowen and Nidal Hilal 4

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4.2 THE RANgE OF POssIbILITIEs FOR INvEsTIgATINg MEMbRANEs 111<br />

corresponding pore size distribution of a single pore in a nanofiltration<br />

membrane, XP117 from PCI Membranes.<br />

Caution is needed here. It is only in exceptional instances that it is possible<br />

to obtain images of such small pores. Further, some scepticism is in<br />

order. The existence of pores in microfiltration membranes may be confirmed<br />

by optical images. It does not seem unreasonable to push the limit<br />

of belief in pores down to the ultrafiltration range. But in the nanofiltration<br />

range, we need to be especially aware of the possibility of artefacts that<br />

look like pores <strong>and</strong> of seeing what we wish to visualise.<br />

It was mentioned in Section 4.1 that an Atomic Force Microscope can<br />

also quantify the other key properties controlling the membrane performance.<br />

The crucial innovation in the determination of such properties is<br />

the development of colloid probes. Such probes are formed by attaching<br />

particles of dimensions of the order of �1 �m to the end of tipless cantilevers.<br />

Such attachment may be carried out using the manipulation properties<br />

of an Atomic Force Microscope, but greater success is achieved with<br />

the use of specially designed micromanipulation equipment. An example<br />

of a colloid probe is shown in the electron microscopy image of Figure 4.4.<br />

The silica colloid probe shown is at about the lower size limit for successful<br />

micromanipulation <strong>and</strong> subsequent measurement.<br />

If such probes are manipulated to approach a single point on a membrane<br />

surface in a controlled manner in an electrolyte solution, it is possible<br />

to directly quantify the electrical double layer interactions between probe<br />

<strong>and</strong> membrane, also shown in Figure 4.4, for two solutions of differing ionic<br />

strengths. Such electrical interactions are very important in determining the<br />

rejection of colloids <strong>and</strong> biological macromolecules during ultrafiltration.<br />

The adhesion of process stream components to membranes also has an<br />

important influence on membrane performance. Ideally, such adhesion<br />

(F/R) / (mN/m)<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

10-4 10<br />

M NaCl, pH8<br />

-1 M NaCl, pH8<br />

0<br />

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40<br />

Distance / nm<br />

FIgURE 4.4 SEM image of a 0.75 �m silica sphere attached to a tipless AFM cantilever<br />

<strong>and</strong> force distance curves for the approach of the probe to a Cyclopore microfiltration membrane<br />

in NaCl solutions at pH 8. (F is force <strong>and</strong> R is sphere radius.)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!