11RXNdQ

11RXNdQ 11RXNdQ

public.archive
from public.archive More from this publisher
19.02.2013 Views

From one China to another* 5 stops and looks at a bundle of material at his feet. In China, you know, when a child dies, it is wrapped in a red sheet and abandoned during the night in a corner. In the morning, the refuse carts take it off to the communal grave. And there is Barrès, quite moved. How could he fail to be moved by this quaint custom? And what pure artistic pleasure he takes looking at these little scarlet marks, which, lively and bright, set off the grey of the dawn. Nearby someone has left a dead cat. A dead cat, a dead kid: two little souls, two little ripples. Barrès brings them together in the same funeral orison and then moves on to more distinguished comparisons. At that same hour perhaps, wrapped in purple silk, the beautiful, warm body of a concubine is being carried to the imperial bed. A small warm body, a small cold body; on each of them, the same bloodstain. And there we are: blood, voluptuousness, death. Lucky Barrès; he in turn died, taking to the grave the secret of a clear conscience. We, however, have seen children die like rats in the bombing raids or the Nazi concentration camps; when, against a splendid backdrop of red earth and palm trees, we are shown flies eating the eyes of new-born babies, we look away with a guilty conscience. Try and explain that! One day, in a back-street of Naples, the stable door of a dark cavern opened; on a huge double bed a tiny, lost, six-month-old baby was lying; it appeared made-up, its face wrinkled like a piece of cloth. It could easily have been mistaken for the 90-year-old cardinal who had said mass at Saint Peter’s on the previous Sunday. The baby was dead. Seeing this indiscreetly displayed Neapolitan death once was enough for me. I feel incapable of appreciating fully the poetic shrouds of the poor Chinese babies; I look through them and make out a wrinkled face, too young even to be childlike. We must have become insensitive: the thought of evoking the silk shawl, the silky skin of the beautiful Tseu-hi does not cross our minds. We content ourselves with thinking that we must prevent children from dying. And before this murdered infant, rejected waste of the Kuomintang, we wish for the victory of the Eighth Army. This album is an announcement; it announces the end of tourism. It gently teaches us, without useless pathos, that poverty has lost its picturesque quality and will never recover it. Poverty is there, however, unbearable and discreet. On every page it manifests itself, in three elementary actions: carrying, scavenging, pilfering. In all the capitals of poverty, the poor carry bundles. They always keep them close by. When they sit down, they place them by their side and watch over them. What do they put in them? Everything: wood gathered in a park, hastily, crusts of bread, bits of wire pulled off a fence, scraps of cloth. If the bundle is too heavy, they drag it along, in wheelbarrows or handcarts. Poverty always seems to be doing a moonlight flit. In Peking, Shanghai, Nanking everyone is pulling or pushing: here men are straining to make their cart go forward; there they are on a bridge; the road climbs; they must struggle twice as hard; there are urchins about, always ready to help for a hand-out. Like the unemployed man in Deux Sous d’Espoir who positions himself halfway up a hill and pulls the carriage horses by the bridle. The tall building in the background is a lighthouse. At the top of the lighthouse is the eye of the West; its revolving gaze sweeps across China. The top three levels have been reserved for foreign press correspondents. How high up they are! Much too high to see what is happening down below. They dance high in the sky with their wives and mistresses. Meanwhile, at ground level, the porters push their carts and Chiang Kai-shek is being defeated by the communist armies. The Americans see neither the little flat dwellings of China nor the armed peasants nor the porters. Yet the porters have only

Colonialism and Neocolonialism 6 to look up to see the lighthouse of America. In all the capitals of poverty, people scavenge. They scavenge in the soil and the subsoil; they gather round refuse bins; they slip right into the rubble: ‘What others throw away is mine; what is no longer of any use to them is good enough for me.’ On waste ground near Peking, the rubbish piles up. This is the refuse of the poor; they have sifted through everything, they have already rummaged through their own rubbish; they have only left, reluctantly, what is uneatable, unusable, unspeakable, revolting. And yet the flock is there. On all fours. They will scavenge all day, every day. In all the capitals of poverty, there is pilfering. Is it stealing? No, just picking things up. These bales of cotton have just been unloaded. If they stay an hour longer on the dock, they will disappear. No sooner have they been put down than the crowd rushes forward and surrounds them. Everyone attempts to pull off a handful of cotton. Many handfuls of cotton, gathered day after day – that makes an item of clothing. I recognize the look on the women’s faces, I have seen it in Marseilles, in Algiers, in London, in the streets of Berlin; it is serious, quick and hounded, anguish mingles with greed. You have to grab before you are grabbed. When the bales have been loaded onto a lorry, the kids will run after it with outstretched hands. Meanwhile, in Nanking, there is shooting in the streets. Alone in the middle of a boulevard, a man is bent over an armchair which is ripped open; he wants to get its stuffing. If he does not get hit right between the eyes by one of the bullets whistling around his ears, he will have gathered enough fuel for one hour of just one winter’s day. Every day the poor people dig, scavenge and gather. Every day the artisans repeat their traditional movements. At every dawn, officers do their exercises in the gardens of the Forbidden City, while ageing ghosts drift through the palaces. Every morning Peking reconstructs its appearance of the previous day, the previous week, the previous millennium. In our country, industry is destroying all the old frameworks; but over there, why should they change? Cartier-Bresson has photographed eternity. Fragile eternity; it is a tune played over and over again. To stop it, you would have to smash the record. And indeed it is going to be smashed. History is at the city gates; from day to day, in the rice fields, in the mountains, and on the plains, it is being made. One more day and then another one: it will be over; the old record will be smashed to pieces. These timeless snapshots are precisely dated; they fix forever the last moments of the Eternal. Between the circular time of old China and the irreversible time of new China, there is an intermediate phase, a gelatinous duration equally distant from History and repetition: the time of waiting. The city has undone the sheaf of its millions of daily gestures: no longer does anyone file, or carve, or scrape, or trim, or adjust, or burnish. Abandoning their small living spaces, their ceremonies, their neighbours, people go and crowd together, in shapeless masses, in front of stations, on the docks. Houses empty. And the workshops. And the markets. In outlying locations, crowds gather, compact together, coagulate; their fine structures are crushed. Heavy, dense pictures replace the airy photos of old Peking. Waiting. Whenever they do not take control of History, the masses experience great events as periods of endless waiting. The masses of Peking and Shanghai are not making History; they are subjected to it. As are, moreover, the police who watch them, the soldiers who move among them, who return from the front, who

Colonialism and Neocolonialism 6<br />

to look up to see the lighthouse of America.<br />

In all the capitals of poverty, people scavenge. They scavenge in the soil and the<br />

subsoil; they gather round refuse bins; they slip right into the rubble: ‘What others throw<br />

away is mine; what is no longer of any use to them is good enough for me.’ On waste<br />

ground near Peking, the rubbish piles up. This is the refuse of the poor; they have sifted<br />

through everything, they have already rummaged through their own rubbish; they have<br />

only left, reluctantly, what is uneatable, unusable, unspeakable, revolting. And yet the<br />

flock is there. On all fours. They will scavenge all day, every day.<br />

In all the capitals of poverty, there is pilfering. Is it stealing? No, just picking things<br />

up. These bales of cotton have just been unloaded. If they stay an hour longer on the<br />

dock, they will disappear. No sooner have they been put down than the crowd rushes<br />

forward and surrounds them. Everyone attempts to pull off a handful of cotton. Many<br />

handfuls of cotton, gathered day after day – that makes an item of clothing. I recognize<br />

the look on the women’s faces, I have seen it in Marseilles, in Algiers, in London, in the<br />

streets of Berlin; it is serious, quick and hounded, anguish mingles with greed. You have<br />

to grab before you are grabbed. When the bales have been loaded onto a lorry, the kids<br />

will run after it with outstretched hands. Meanwhile, in Nanking, there is shooting in the<br />

streets. Alone in the middle of a boulevard, a man is bent over an armchair which is<br />

ripped open; he wants to get its stuffing. If he does not get hit right between the eyes by<br />

one of the bullets whistling around his ears, he will have gathered enough fuel for one<br />

hour of just one winter’s day.<br />

Every day the poor people dig, scavenge and gather. Every day the artisans repeat their<br />

traditional movements. At every dawn, officers do their exercises in the gardens of the<br />

Forbidden City, while ageing ghosts drift through the palaces. Every morning Peking<br />

reconstructs its appearance of the previous day, the previous week, the previous<br />

millennium. In our country, industry is destroying all the old frameworks; but over there,<br />

why should they change? Cartier-Bresson has photographed eternity.<br />

Fragile eternity; it is a tune played over and over again. To stop it, you would have to<br />

smash the record. And indeed it is going to be smashed. History is at the city gates; from<br />

day to day, in the rice fields, in the mountains, and on the plains, it is being made. One<br />

more day and then another one: it will be over; the old record will be smashed to pieces.<br />

These timeless snapshots are precisely dated; they fix forever the last moments of the<br />

Eternal.<br />

Between the circular time of old China and the irreversible time of new China, there is<br />

an intermediate phase, a gelatinous duration equally distant from History and repetition:<br />

the time of waiting. The city has undone the sheaf of its millions of daily gestures: no<br />

longer does anyone file, or carve, or scrape, or trim, or adjust, or burnish. Abandoning<br />

their small living spaces, their ceremonies, their neighbours, people go and crowd<br />

together, in shapeless masses, in front of stations, on the docks. Houses empty. And the<br />

workshops. And the markets. In outlying locations, crowds gather, compact together,<br />

coagulate; their fine structures are crushed. Heavy, dense pictures replace the airy photos<br />

of old Peking. Waiting. Whenever they do not take control of History, the masses<br />

experience great events as periods of endless waiting. The masses of Peking and<br />

Shanghai are not making History; they are subjected to it. As are, moreover, the police<br />

who watch them, the soldiers who move among them, who return from the front, who

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!