11RXNdQ
11RXNdQ 11RXNdQ
The Political Thought of Patrice Lumumba* 113 amazing thing is that it was caught out at its own game and considered this évolué, the son of a Catholic, with a Catholic marriage, and the father of Catholics, to be a secret agent of the Kremlin. If one wishes to judge the situation better, one should compare the desperate appeal of this Jacobin ‘without an economic option’ with what Castro was able to do on an island stuck on the side of America. And let us make no mistake: Castro’s victory was due precisely to the fact that he took the leadership of a socialist revolution: the failure of this Congolese, the title ‘communist’ with which people imagined they were blackening him, is all simply due to the fact that he did not want to commit himself to reworking the infrastructure of the country. Africa has understood: when an independent head of government asks for help from the Soviets, Westerners dismiss him. Neutrality will remain an empty declaration of principle so long as the various states of the black continent do not unite to impose it. The alive and captive Lumumba was the shame and the rage of an entire continent: he was present for everyone as a demand which they could neither fulfil nor remove; in him, everyone recognized the power and the ferocity of neocolonial trickery. He therefore had to be dealt with as quickly as possible; imperialism kept its hands clean; it was in the interest of its two main representatives, Kasavubu and the pathetic Mobutu, not to have spilt this blood in front of their people. Tschombe did the killing: in any case, the Union Minière and the colonists had compromised him so much, and he had invested so much zeal in selling himself that it would soon be necessary to liquidate him as well. They wiped out a black who had been made prime minister and who took his mission seriously; Kasavubu was again asked to form a cabinet. I suppose they thought that the dead man would be less of an embarrassment than the living: we forget the deceased. What can be done for him? With him? The overexcited Africans would be deprived of any reason to call their brothers to a liberating crusade by the single bayonet thrust which, so they say, Munongo took upon himself to administer. That, at any rate, was the calculation. As we know, it was wrong. The dead Lumumba ceased to be a person and became Africa in its entirety, with its unitary will, the multiplicity of its social and political systems, its divisions, its disagreements, its power and its impotence: he was not, nor could he be, the hero of pan- Africanism: he was its martyr. His story has highlighted for everyone the profound link between independence, unity and the struggle against the multi-national corporations. His death – I remember that Fanon in Rome was devastated by it – was a cry of alarm; in him, the whole continent died and was resurrected. The African Nations have understood: what Accra was saying, Addis-Ababa is about to do: they will put in place a shared mechanism which will allow them to support revolutionary struggles in countries that have not yet gained independence. Unity is war; influenced by Algeria, some are understanding better and better that it is also the socialist revolution. The Congo has lost only a battle. With the protection of the National Congolese Army (ANC), the Congolese bourgeoisie, that group of venal traitors, will complete its work and form an exploitative class. Capitalist concentration will gradually overcome the feudal divisions and unite the exploited; all the conditions for Castroism will be in place. The Cubans, however, honour the memory of Martí who died at the end of the last
Colonialism and Neocolonialism 114 century without seeing Cuba’s victory over Spain or the subjugation of the island to American imperialism. If in a few years’ time, the Congolese Castro wishes to teach his own people that unity must be won, he will remind them of its first martyr, Lumumba.
- Page 93 and 94: Colonialism and Neocolonialism 62 e
- Page 95 and 96: Colonialism and Neocolonialism 64 w
- Page 97 and 98: Colonialism and Neocolonialism 66 t
- Page 99 and 100: Colonialism and Neocolonialism 68 I
- Page 101 and 102: Colonialism and Neocolonialism 70 d
- Page 103 and 104: The Sleepwalkers * Yesterday evenin
- Page 105 and 106: Colonialism and Neocolonialism 74 p
- Page 107 and 108: Colonialism and Neocolonialism 76 a
- Page 109 and 110: Colonialism and Neocolonialism 78 i
- Page 111 and 112: Colonialism and Neocolonialism 80 f
- Page 113 and 114: Colonialism and Neocolonialism 82 t
- Page 115 and 116: Colonialism and Neocolonialism 84 m
- Page 117 and 118: Colonialism and Neocolonialism 86 w
- Page 119 and 120: naiveté, to be harmful at that tim
- Page 121 and 122: Colonialism and Neocolonialism 90 l
- Page 123 and 124: Colonialism and Neocolonialism 92 t
- Page 125 and 126: Colonialism and Neocolonialism 94 h
- Page 127 and 128: Colonialism and Neocolonialism 96 e
- Page 129 and 130: Colonialism and Neocolonialism 98 t
- Page 131 and 132: Colonialism and Neocolonialism 100
- Page 133 and 134: Colonialism and Neocolonialism 102
- Page 135 and 136: Colonialism and Neocolonialism 104
- Page 137 and 138: Colonialism and Neocolonialism 106
- Page 139 and 140: Colonialism and Neocolonialism 108
- Page 141 and 142: Colonialism and Neocolonialism 110
- Page 143: Colonialism and Neocolonialism 112
The Political Thought of Patrice Lumumba* 113<br />
amazing thing is that it was caught out at its own game and considered this évolué, the<br />
son of a Catholic, with a Catholic marriage, and the father of Catholics, to be a secret<br />
agent of the Kremlin. If one wishes to judge the situation better, one should compare the<br />
desperate appeal of this Jacobin ‘without an economic option’ with what Castro was able<br />
to do on an island stuck on the side of America. And let us make no mistake: Castro’s<br />
victory was due precisely to the fact that he took the leadership of a socialist revolution:<br />
the failure of this Congolese, the title ‘communist’ with which people imagined they were<br />
blackening him, is all simply due to the fact that he did not want to commit himself to<br />
reworking the infrastructure of the country. Africa has understood: when an independent<br />
head of government asks for help from the Soviets, Westerners dismiss him. Neutrality<br />
will remain an empty declaration of principle so long as the various states of the black<br />
continent do not unite to impose it.<br />
The alive and captive Lumumba was the shame and the rage of an entire continent: he<br />
was present for everyone as a demand which they could neither fulfil nor remove; in him,<br />
everyone recognized the power and the ferocity of neocolonial trickery. He therefore had<br />
to be dealt with as quickly as possible; imperialism kept its hands clean; it was in the<br />
interest of its two main representatives, Kasavubu and the pathetic Mobutu, not to have<br />
spilt this blood in front of their people. Tschombe did the killing: in any case, the Union<br />
Minière and the colonists had compromised him so much, and he had invested so much<br />
zeal in selling himself that it would soon be necessary to liquidate him as well. They<br />
wiped out a black who had been made prime minister and who took his mission<br />
seriously; Kasavubu was again asked to form a cabinet. I suppose they thought that the<br />
dead man would be less of an embarrassment than the living: we forget the deceased.<br />
What can be done for him? With him? The overexcited Africans would be deprived of<br />
any reason to call their brothers to a liberating crusade by the single bayonet thrust which,<br />
so they say, Munongo took upon himself to administer. That, at any rate, was the<br />
calculation. As we know, it was wrong.<br />
The dead Lumumba ceased to be a person and became Africa in its entirety, with its<br />
unitary will, the multiplicity of its social and political systems, its divisions, its<br />
disagreements, its power and its impotence: he was not, nor could he be, the hero of pan-<br />
Africanism: he was its martyr. His story has highlighted for everyone the profound link<br />
between independence, unity and the struggle against the multi-national corporations. His<br />
death – I remember that Fanon in Rome was devastated by it – was a cry of alarm; in<br />
him, the whole continent died and was resurrected. The African Nations have understood:<br />
what Accra was saying, Addis-Ababa is about to do: they will put in place a shared<br />
mechanism which will allow them to support revolutionary struggles in countries that<br />
have not yet gained independence. Unity is war; influenced by Algeria, some are<br />
understanding better and better that it is also the socialist revolution.<br />
The Congo has lost only a battle. With the protection of the National Congolese Army<br />
(ANC), the Congolese bourgeoisie, that group of venal traitors, will complete its work<br />
and form an exploitative class. Capitalist concentration will gradually overcome the<br />
feudal divisions and unite the exploited; all the conditions for Castroism will be in place.<br />
The Cubans, however, honour the memory of Martí who died at the end of the last