Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...
Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ... Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...
CMS-1403-FC though it was a technologically advanced seating system, was supported by the Medicare statute and regulations. In reaching this conclusion, the Court stated that the Secretary could conclude that the seating system met the definition of DME, which “unequivocally includes ‘wheelchairs,’” since the system served the same (as well as additional) functions as a wheelchair. We believe this case affirms the principle that the Secretary has the discretion to interpret the statute and to assign a product to a particular Medicare category even when this will result in non-coverage determinations by Medicare. 3. Public Comments Received on the Proposed Rule Comment: Several commenters urged that low vision aids should be covered for individuals with vision loss to help individuals to remain as independent as possible, to ensure quality of life, to conduct activities of daily living safely and effectively, and to avoid placement in assistive living or nursing homes. The commenters believe the use of prescribed low vision aids would help avoid greater expenses to the Medicare program due to reduced illnesses, injuries, and loss of independence. Several commenters indicated that they did not have sufficient funds to obtain these items without Medicare coverage. 990
CMS-1403-FC Response: We understand and can appreciate the commenters’ concerns. However, the Medicare statute does not provide for the coverage of every service or item that may increase an individual’s quality of life or which may provide a medical benefit. For example, in addition to excluding eyeglasses from coverage, the Act also generally excludes coverage of dental services, orthopedic shoes, and hearing aids. We understand that eyeglasses aid individuals in conducting activities of daily living; however, the Medicare statute makes only limited exceptions to the statutory eyeglass coverage exclusion, such as for “conventional eyeglasses and contact lenses,” in certain cases. Moreover, we believe the appropriate regulatory interpretation of this statutory exclusion is to remain consistent with our longstanding views, and finalize the proposed regulation without modification. Comment: Some commenters stated that the regulation does not rely on the plain language of the statute. The commenters suggested that eyeglasses and low vision devices are dissimilar: eyeglasses are optical systems to aid the vision of a person who essentially has normal vision, while low vision aids are prosthetic in nature for persons whose vision is impaired in other ways than refractive error. The commenters believe that the regulation fails to 991
- Page 939 and 940: CMS-1403-FC Tables 29 and 30 also i
- Page 941 and 942: CMS-1403-FC RADIOLOGY AND CERTAIN O
- Page 943 and 944: CMS-1403-FC 93320 Doppler echo exam
- Page 945 and 946: CMS-1403-FC index data, that the hi
- Page 947 and 948: CMS-1403-FC TABLE 32: Increase in t
- Page 949 and 950: CMS-1403-FC C. The Update Adjustmen
- Page 951 and 952: CMS-1403-FC end of the prior year a
- Page 953 and 954: CMS-1403-FC CY 2009, the statute re
- Page 955 and 956: CMS-1403-FC Actual08 = Estimated Ac
- Page 957 and 958: CMS-1403-FC 1848(f)(3)(C)(i) of the
- Page 959 and 960: CMS-1403-FC ● Screening mammograp
- Page 961 and 962: CMS-1403-FC payments while promotin
- Page 963 and 964: CMS-1403-FC E. Final Sustainable Gr
- Page 965 and 966: CMS-1403-FC included in the SGR (us
- Page 967 and 968: CMS-1403-FC that this figure will c
- Page 969 and 970: CMS-1403-FC physicians' services in
- Page 971 and 972: CMS-1403-FC imaging services, the M
- Page 973 and 974: CMS-1403-FC CY 2007. Table 42 illus
- Page 975 and 976: CMS-1403-FC year to the entire year
- Page 977 and 978: CMS-1403-FC the CF. Therefore, this
- Page 979 and 980: CMS-1403-FC estimate that CY 2009 R
- Page 981 and 982: CMS-1403-FC Table 44: Calculation o
- Page 983 and 984: CMS-1403-FC XI. Payment for Certain
- Page 985 and 986: CMS-1403-FC In the Competitive Acqu
- Page 987 and 988: CMS-1403-FC glasses, hand magnifier
- Page 989: CMS-1403-FC Our interpretation of t
- Page 993 and 994: CMS-1403-FC defines “eyeglass”
- Page 995 and 996: CMS-1403-FC this statutory exclusio
- Page 997 and 998: CMS-1403-FC advances in the use of
- Page 999 and 1000: CMS-1403-FC is paid for his or her
- Page 1001 and 1002: CMS-1403-FC XII. Provisions of the
- Page 1003 and 1004: CMS-1403-FC these RUC recommendatio
- Page 1005 and 1006: CMS-1403-FC services. We believe a
- Page 1007 and 1008: CMS-1403-FC Section 144(b) of the M
- Page 1009 and 1010: CMS-1403-FC rulemaking with respect
- Page 1011 and 1012: CMS-1403-FC (respectively) of this
- Page 1013 and 1014: CMS-1403-FC completing and submitti
- Page 1015 and 1016: CMS-1403-FC §424.516(d)(1). Additi
- Page 1017 and 1018: CMS-1403-FC to several associated i
- Page 1019 and 1020: CMS-1403-FC incentive payment for 2
- Page 1021 and 1022: CMS-1403-FC year of PQRI reporting)
- Page 1023 and 1024: CMS-1403-FC Based on the assumption
- Page 1025 and 1026: CMS-1403-FC these activities for th
- Page 1027 and 1028: CMS-1403-FC per hour, we estimate t
- Page 1029 and 1030: CMS-1403-FC Because of the large nu
- Page 1031 and 1032: CMS-1403-FC threshold, and hence al
- Page 1033 and 1034: CMS-1403-FC shoes, the regulation i
- Page 1035 and 1036: CMS-1403-FC with comment period for
- Page 1037 and 1038: CMS-1403-FC substance of State laws
- Page 1039 and 1040: CMS-1403-FC $20 million from what e
<strong>CMS</strong>-1403-FC<br />
though it was a technologically advanced seating system,<br />
was supported by the Medicare statute and regulations. In<br />
reaching this conclusion, the Court stated that the<br />
Secretary could conclude that the seating system met the<br />
definition of DME, which “unequivocally includes<br />
‘wheelchairs,’” since the system served the same (as well<br />
as additional) functions as a wheelchair. We believe this<br />
case affirms the principle that the Secretary <strong>has</strong> the<br />
discretion to interpret the statute and to assign a product<br />
to a particular Medicare category even when this will<br />
result in non-coverage determinations by Medicare.<br />
3. Public Comments Received on the Proposed Rule<br />
Comment: Several commenters urged that low vision<br />
aids should be covered for individuals with vision loss to<br />
help individuals to remain as independent as possible, to<br />
ensure quality of life, to conduct activities of daily<br />
living safely and effectively, and to avoid placement in<br />
assistive living or nursing homes. The commenters believe<br />
the use of prescribed low vision aids would help avoid<br />
greater expenses to the Medicare program due to reduced<br />
illnesses, injuries, and loss of independence. Several<br />
commenters indicated that they did not have sufficient<br />
funds to obtain these items without Medicare coverage.<br />
990