Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ... Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

healthcare.philips.com
from healthcare.philips.com More from this publisher
19.02.2013 Views

CMS-1403-FC though it was a technologically advanced seating system, was supported by the Medicare statute and regulations. In reaching this conclusion, the Court stated that the Secretary could conclude that the seating system met the definition of DME, which “unequivocally includes ‘wheelchairs,’” since the system served the same (as well as additional) functions as a wheelchair. We believe this case affirms the principle that the Secretary has the discretion to interpret the statute and to assign a product to a particular Medicare category even when this will result in non-coverage determinations by Medicare. 3. Public Comments Received on the Proposed Rule Comment: Several commenters urged that low vision aids should be covered for individuals with vision loss to help individuals to remain as independent as possible, to ensure quality of life, to conduct activities of daily living safely and effectively, and to avoid placement in assistive living or nursing homes. The commenters believe the use of prescribed low vision aids would help avoid greater expenses to the Medicare program due to reduced illnesses, injuries, and loss of independence. Several commenters indicated that they did not have sufficient funds to obtain these items without Medicare coverage. 990

CMS-1403-FC Response: We understand and can appreciate the commenters’ concerns. However, the Medicare statute does not provide for the coverage of every service or item that may increase an individual’s quality of life or which may provide a medical benefit. For example, in addition to excluding eyeglasses from coverage, the Act also generally excludes coverage of dental services, orthopedic shoes, and hearing aids. We understand that eyeglasses aid individuals in conducting activities of daily living; however, the Medicare statute makes only limited exceptions to the statutory eyeglass coverage exclusion, such as for “conventional eyeglasses and contact lenses,” in certain cases. Moreover, we believe the appropriate regulatory interpretation of this statutory exclusion is to remain consistent with our longstanding views, and finalize the proposed regulation without modification. Comment: Some commenters stated that the regulation does not rely on the plain language of the statute. The commenters suggested that eyeglasses and low vision devices are dissimilar: eyeglasses are optical systems to aid the vision of a person who essentially has normal vision, while low vision aids are prosthetic in nature for persons whose vision is impaired in other ways than refractive error. The commenters believe that the regulation fails to 991

<strong>CMS</strong>-1403-FC<br />

though it was a technologically advanced seating system,<br />

was supported by the Medicare statute and regulations. In<br />

reaching this conclusion, the Court stated that the<br />

Secretary could conclude that the seating system met the<br />

definition of DME, which “unequivocally includes<br />

‘wheelchairs,’” since the system served the same (as well<br />

as additional) functions as a wheelchair. We believe this<br />

case affirms the principle that the Secretary <strong>has</strong> the<br />

discretion to interpret the statute and to assign a product<br />

to a particular Medicare category even when this will<br />

result in non-coverage determinations by Medicare.<br />

3. Public Comments Received on the Proposed Rule<br />

Comment: Several commenters urged that low vision<br />

aids should be covered for individuals with vision loss to<br />

help individuals to remain as independent as possible, to<br />

ensure quality of life, to conduct activities of daily<br />

living safely and effectively, and to avoid placement in<br />

assistive living or nursing homes. The commenters believe<br />

the use of prescribed low vision aids would help avoid<br />

greater expenses to the Medicare program due to reduced<br />

illnesses, injuries, and loss of independence. Several<br />

commenters indicated that they did not have sufficient<br />

funds to obtain these items without Medicare coverage.<br />

990

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!