19.02.2013 Views

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>CMS</strong>-1403-FC<br />

IV. Potentially Misvalued Services Under the Physician Fee<br />

Schedule<br />

A. Valuing Services under the Physician Fee Schedule<br />

As explained in the CY 2009 PFS proposed rule<br />

(73 FR 38582), the AMA RUC provides recommendations to <strong>CMS</strong><br />

for the valuation of new and revised codes, as well as<br />

codes identified as misvalued under the 5-Year Review of<br />

Work. On an ongoing basis, the RUC’s PE Subcommittee<br />

reviews direct PE (clinical staff, medical supplies,<br />

medical equipment) for individual services and examines the<br />

many broad and methodological issues relating to the<br />

development of PE RVUs.<br />

There <strong>has</strong> <strong>been</strong> considerable concern expressed by the<br />

Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC), the<br />

Congress, and other stakeholders in accurate pricing under<br />

the PFS. Despite the large increase in work RVUs for many<br />

medical visits during the last 5-Year Review of physician<br />

work, there continues to be concern that the presence of<br />

many overvalued procedures within the PFS disadvantages<br />

primary care services and creates distortions in the PFS.<br />

Critics have stated the relative imbalance in the number of<br />

codes for which the work RVUs are increased rather than<br />

decreased in the three 5-Year Reviews of work RVUs.<br />

876

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!