19.02.2013 Views

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>CMS</strong>-1403-FC<br />

where the SNF resident who receives them is not in a<br />

covered Part A stay.<br />

Thus, for services that SNF residents receive during<br />

the course of a covered Part A stay, the MIPPA’s<br />

designation of a SNF as a telehealth setting effectively<br />

leaves unchanged the scope of the bundled per diem payment<br />

that the SNF PPS makes for the covered stay itself.<br />

Accordingly, the use of telehealth as a vehicle for service<br />

delivery would not serve to bundle types of services (such<br />

as those of physicians) that are otherwise separately<br />

payable under Part B when furnished to such residents, nor<br />

would it serve to unbundle types of services (such as those<br />

of CSWs) that are otherwise included within the bundled SNF<br />

PPS payment.<br />

In order to reflect this conforming amendment, we are<br />

revising the implementing regulations at §411.15(p)(2) to<br />

include an additional clause, which specifies that types of<br />

services that would otherwise be excluded from SNF<br />

consolidated billing when furnished in a face-to-face<br />

encounter are also excluded when furnished via telehealth<br />

under section 1834(m)(4)(C)(ii)(VII) of the Act.<br />

Consistent with the preceding discussion, this revision<br />

serves to clarify that a type of service (such as a<br />

physician service) that is otherwise excluded from SNF<br />

873

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!