19.02.2013 Views

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>CMS</strong>-1403-FC<br />

prescribers for 2009 are described in detail in section<br />

II.O2. of this final rule with comment period.<br />

Section 132(a)(1) of the MIPPA also amends section<br />

1848(m) of the Act, as redesignated by section 131(b)(2) of<br />

the MIPPA, to provide for an exemption from both the<br />

incentive payment and the payment differential for a<br />

particular reporting period of certain eligible<br />

professionals. The Secretary is authorized to choose<br />

between two possible standards for the exemption: one based<br />

upon whether the allowed charges to which the electronic<br />

prescribing quality measure applies are less than 10<br />

percent of the total allowed charges for all covered<br />

professional services furnished by the eligible<br />

professional during the reporting period; and one based on<br />

whether the eligible professional does not submit<br />

(including both electronically and nonelectronically) a<br />

sufficient number (as determined by the Secretary) of<br />

prescriptions under Part D (which can again be assessed<br />

using Part D drug claims data). We do not intend to use<br />

this latter standard for 2009. However, to the extent that<br />

we intend to use this latter standard in future years, we<br />

will address how we plan to define “sufficient” through<br />

notice and comment rulemaking. For 2009, the criteria for<br />

exemption from the incentive payments for electronic<br />

825

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!