Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...
Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ... Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...
CMS-1403-FC Comment: A commenter recommended that the existing language in §424.36(b)(6)(ii)(A) be modified to state that, in the case of an emergency transport, the general crew signature on an emergency ambulance incident report is sufficient to meet the requirements of §424.36(b) and that a separate crew signature is not required. The commenter suggested, as an alternative, that if we determine that the signature of an ambulance employee present during the transport is necessary, it should be sufficient if the employee signature on the incident report is obtained “after the fact,” rather than contemporaneous with the transport. The commenter stated that it is necessary that we allow signatures obtained after the transport because the ambulance crew’s primary concern is taking care of the patient, not doing paperwork, such as a signed incident report. Response: We are not persuaded to modify the requirement in §424.36(b)(6)(ii)(A) to state that the general crew signature on an incident report is sufficient and that a separate crew signature is not required. We believe that the commenter’s suggestion that any member of the general crew be permitted to sign the incident report as evidence that the service was rendered as billed would not satisfy our integrity concerns, because the general 770
CMS-1403-FC crew member would have no direct knowledge regarding the transport services. It is also our understanding that the ambulance crew completes a trip report that describes the condition of the beneficiary, treatment, origin/destination, etc. Therefore, we believe it would be a minimal burden upon the ambulance crew signing the incident or trip report to prepare a statement detailing why the beneficiary is unable to sign a claim form at the time of transport. We also emphasize that §424.36(b)(6)(ii)(A) requires that a contemporaneous statement signed by an ambulance employee present during the trip be obtained. A contemporaneous statement, rather than one obtained after the fact, is necessary to meet our integrity concerns, that is, to verify that the trip took place as claimed on the bill. Comment: Several commenters suggested that we eliminate the terms “emergency and nonemergency ambulance transport services” in §424.36(b)(6) and replace those words with “ambulance services.” Response: We are not persuaded to revise §424.36(b)(6) in the manner suggested by the commenters. Although readers familiar with the Federal Register publications of the CY 2008 PFS final rule and the CY 2009 PFS final rule would realize that “ambulance services” 771
- Page 719 and 720: CMS-1403-FC that the requirement fo
- Page 721 and 722: CMS-1403-FC degree in radiologic te
- Page 723 and 724: CMS-1403-FC the physicians that fur
- Page 725 and 726: CMS-1403-FC is associated with a te
- Page 727 and 728: CMS-1403-FC facility in which a tec
- Page 729 and 730: CMS-1403-FC by the Medicare program
- Page 731 and 732: CMS-1403-FC pressure (CPAP)” and
- Page 733 and 734: CMS-1403-FC for example chronic obs
- Page 735 and 736: CMS-1403-FC thus they believe leadi
- Page 737 and 738: CMS-1403-FC Excepting attended faci
- Page 739 and 740: CMS-1403-FC supplier separately. Ho
- Page 741 and 742: CMS-1403-FC final rule’s provisio
- Page 743 and 744: CMS-1403-FC as a DME supplier and p
- Page 745 and 746: CMS-1403-FC Moreover, given our gen
- Page 747 and 748: CMS-1403-FC resources and infrastru
- Page 749 and 750: CMS-1403-FC Comment: Several commen
- Page 751 and 752: CMS-1403-FC organization through a
- Page 753 and 754: CMS-1403-FC After reviewing the pub
- Page 755 and 756: CMS-1403-FC the nonparticipating ho
- Page 757 and 758: CMS-1403-FC be costly and burdensom
- Page 759 and 760: CMS-1403-FC adopting our proposal t
- Page 761 and 762: CMS-1403-FC We are not persuaded to
- Page 763 and 764: CMS-1403-FC §424.36(b)(6)(ii)(C)(2
- Page 765 and 766: CMS-1403-FC be made to obtain the s
- Page 767 and 768: CMS-1403-FC willing to sign at the
- Page 769: CMS-1403-FC and not suppliers, may
- Page 773 and 774: CMS-1403-FC In order to determine f
- Page 775 and 776: CMS-1403-FC retrieval of the variou
- Page 777 and 778: CMS-1403-FC plan that demonstrates
- Page 779 and 780: CMS-1403-FC conviction, license sus
- Page 781 and 782: CMS-1403-FC The following is a summ
- Page 783 and 784: CMS-1403-FC faith reduces the time
- Page 785 and 786: CMS-1403-FC suspension or revocatio
- Page 787 and 788: CMS-1403-FC 9 percent per year. 2 I
- Page 789 and 790: CMS-1403-FC magnetic resonance imag
- Page 791 and 792: CMS-1403-FC Committee for Quality A
- Page 793 and 794: CMS-1403-FC measures in CMS’ VBP
- Page 795 and 796: CMS-1403-FC the Boston program site
- Page 797 and 798: CMS-1403-FC conditions that are hig
- Page 799 and 800: CMS-1403-FC reports? ● Do physici
- Page 801 and 802: CMS-1403-FC most Evaluation and Man
- Page 803 and 804: CMS-1403-FC III. Medicare Improveme
- Page 805 and 806: CMS-1403-FC Specifically, section 1
- Page 807 and 808: CMS-1403-FC period. The public will
- Page 809 and 810: CMS-1403-FC Section 101(b) of the M
- Page 811 and 812: CMS-1403-FC 1 year after the effect
- Page 813 and 814: CMS-1403-FC applies to both adult m
- Page 815 and 816: CMS-1403-FC period is limited to th
- Page 817 and 818: CMS-1403-FC 2007 through 2010. In a
- Page 819 and 820: CMS-1403-FC Section 1848(m)(3)(D) o
<strong>CMS</strong>-1403-FC<br />
Comment: A commenter recommended that the existing<br />
language in §424.36(b)(6)(ii)(A) be modified to state that,<br />
in the case of an emergency transport, the general crew<br />
signature on an emergency ambulance incident report is<br />
sufficient to meet the requirements of §424.36(b) and that<br />
a separate crew signature is not required. The commenter<br />
suggested, as an alternative, that if we determine that the<br />
signature of an ambulance employee present during the<br />
transport is necessary, it should be sufficient if the<br />
employee signature on the incident report is obtained<br />
“after the fact,” rather than contemporaneous with the<br />
transport. The commenter stated that it is necessary that<br />
we allow signatures obtained after the transport because<br />
the ambulance crew’s primary concern is taking care of the<br />
patient, not doing paperwork, such as a signed incident<br />
report.<br />
Response: We are not persuaded to modify the<br />
requirement in §424.36(b)(6)(ii)(A) to state that the<br />
general crew signature on an incident report is sufficient<br />
and that a separate crew signature is not required. We<br />
believe that the commenter’s suggestion that any member of<br />
the general crew be permitted to sign the incident report<br />
as evidence that the service was rendered as billed would<br />
not satisfy our integrity concerns, because the general<br />
770