Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...
Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ... Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...
CMS-1403-FC beneficiary is mentally incapable of signing the “waiver.” The commenters contended that asking for additional documentation to verify that a patient was transported creates a financial burden on the ambulance provider. One commenter stated that its billing office has to do more mailings, follow-up calls and faxes to get a “waiver” completed, and that spouses are reluctant to sign the form for fear that they will be responsible for the ambulance transport bill. The commenter also stated that the forms are confusing to its ambulance crew and that hospital and rehabilitation representatives are reluctant to sign forms. One commenter suggested that checking hospital and rehabilitation bills would be an easier way to document a patient transport, whereas another commenter suggested that we should abolish the signature requirement entirely. Response: We note that whereas several commenters referred to a “waiver” of the signature requirement of §424.36, in fact §424.36 sets forth a signature requirement and alternative means of satisfying the signature requirement. That is, §424.36 generally requires that the beneficiary sign the claim, unless the beneficiary is deceased or unavailable to sign the claim, in which case other individuals or entity representatives (as enumerated in §424.36(b), (c) and (d)) may sign the claim. We are 758
CMS-1403-FC adopting our proposal to amend §424.36(a) to clarify that “the claim” includes the actual claim form or such other form that contains adequate notice to the beneficiary or other authorized individual signing on behalf of the beneficiary that the purpose of the signature is to authorize a provider or supplier to submit a claim to Medicare for specified services furnished to the beneficiary. The purpose of the beneficiary signature is to verify that the services were in fact rendered and were rendered as billed. Our proposal does not impose any new burdens on ambulance providers or suppliers, but rather offers an optional, alternative method, for satisfying the beneficiary signature requirement. We do not agree with the commenters that it is a significant burden on ambulance providers and suppliers to comply with the proposed signature and documentation requirements in order to meet the proposed exception for nonemergency ambulance transports when a beneficiary is incapable of signing a claim form; however, those ambulance providers and suppliers that believe that the signature and documentation requirements of the new exception at §424.36(b)(6) are burdensome may avail themselves of the other means 759
- Page 707 and 708: CMS-1403-FC and CY 2007 PFS final r
- Page 709 and 710: CMS-1403-FC directly affected by th
- Page 711 and 712: CMS-1403-FC requires advanced pract
- Page 713 and 714: CMS-1403-FC applaud CMS for recogni
- Page 715 and 716: CMS-1403-FC standardization of DNP
- Page 717 and 718: CMS-1403-FC for the most part, been
- Page 719 and 720: CMS-1403-FC that the requirement fo
- Page 721 and 722: CMS-1403-FC degree in radiologic te
- Page 723 and 724: CMS-1403-FC the physicians that fur
- Page 725 and 726: CMS-1403-FC is associated with a te
- Page 727 and 728: CMS-1403-FC facility in which a tec
- Page 729 and 730: CMS-1403-FC by the Medicare program
- Page 731 and 732: CMS-1403-FC pressure (CPAP)” and
- Page 733 and 734: CMS-1403-FC for example chronic obs
- Page 735 and 736: CMS-1403-FC thus they believe leadi
- Page 737 and 738: CMS-1403-FC Excepting attended faci
- Page 739 and 740: CMS-1403-FC supplier separately. Ho
- Page 741 and 742: CMS-1403-FC final rule’s provisio
- Page 743 and 744: CMS-1403-FC as a DME supplier and p
- Page 745 and 746: CMS-1403-FC Moreover, given our gen
- Page 747 and 748: CMS-1403-FC resources and infrastru
- Page 749 and 750: CMS-1403-FC Comment: Several commen
- Page 751 and 752: CMS-1403-FC organization through a
- Page 753 and 754: CMS-1403-FC After reviewing the pub
- Page 755 and 756: CMS-1403-FC the nonparticipating ho
- Page 757: CMS-1403-FC be costly and burdensom
- Page 761 and 762: CMS-1403-FC We are not persuaded to
- Page 763 and 764: CMS-1403-FC §424.36(b)(6)(ii)(C)(2
- Page 765 and 766: CMS-1403-FC be made to obtain the s
- Page 767 and 768: CMS-1403-FC willing to sign at the
- Page 769 and 770: CMS-1403-FC and not suppliers, may
- Page 771 and 772: CMS-1403-FC crew member would have
- Page 773 and 774: CMS-1403-FC In order to determine f
- Page 775 and 776: CMS-1403-FC retrieval of the variou
- Page 777 and 778: CMS-1403-FC plan that demonstrates
- Page 779 and 780: CMS-1403-FC conviction, license sus
- Page 781 and 782: CMS-1403-FC The following is a summ
- Page 783 and 784: CMS-1403-FC faith reduces the time
- Page 785 and 786: CMS-1403-FC suspension or revocatio
- Page 787 and 788: CMS-1403-FC 9 percent per year. 2 I
- Page 789 and 790: CMS-1403-FC magnetic resonance imag
- Page 791 and 792: CMS-1403-FC Committee for Quality A
- Page 793 and 794: CMS-1403-FC measures in CMS’ VBP
- Page 795 and 796: CMS-1403-FC the Boston program site
- Page 797 and 798: CMS-1403-FC conditions that are hig
- Page 799 and 800: CMS-1403-FC reports? ● Do physici
- Page 801 and 802: CMS-1403-FC most Evaluation and Man
- Page 803 and 804: CMS-1403-FC III. Medicare Improveme
- Page 805 and 806: CMS-1403-FC Specifically, section 1
- Page 807 and 808: CMS-1403-FC period. The public will
<strong>CMS</strong>-1403-FC<br />
adopting our proposal to amend §424.36(a) to clarify that<br />
“the claim” includes the actual claim form or such other<br />
form that contains adequate notice to the beneficiary or<br />
other authorized individual signing on behalf of the<br />
beneficiary that the purpose of the signature is to<br />
authorize a provider or supplier to submit a claim to<br />
Medicare for specified services furnished to the<br />
beneficiary. The purpose of the beneficiary signature is<br />
to verify that the services were in fact rendered and were<br />
rendered as billed.<br />
Our proposal does not impose any new burdens on<br />
ambulance providers or suppliers, but rather offers an<br />
optional, alternative method, for satisfying the<br />
beneficiary signature requirement. We do not agree with<br />
the commenters that it is a significant burden on ambulance<br />
providers and suppliers to comply with the proposed<br />
signature and <strong>document</strong>ation requirements in order to meet<br />
the proposed exception for nonemergency ambulance<br />
transports when a beneficiary is incapable of signing a<br />
claim form; however, those ambulance providers and<br />
suppliers that believe that the signature and <strong>document</strong>ation<br />
requirements of the new exception at §424.36(b)(6) are<br />
burdensome may avail themselves of the other means<br />
759