19.02.2013 Views

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>CMS</strong>-1403-FC<br />

final rule’s provisions in this regard do not impose new<br />

restrictions for Medicare beneficiaries located in rural<br />

areas. Therefore we believe that a specific rural<br />

exception is not needed at this time.<br />

Comment: Many commenters state that existing fraud<br />

and abuse laws adequately address abuses arising out of<br />

affiliations. For example, the commenters stated that the<br />

Stark regulations do not allow a physician who <strong>has</strong> a<br />

financial relationship (ownership or compensation) with a<br />

DME supplier to refer a patient to that DME supplier for<br />

CPAP, unless an exception applies. In addition, commenters<br />

stated that under many State regulations a physician cannot<br />

have a substantial ownership interest in a DMEPOS supplier<br />

and still refer Medicare patients for DME. The commenters<br />

also state that fraud and abuse is prevented by other<br />

Medicare provisions, such as those limiting coverage of<br />

CPAP to a 12-week period to identify beneficiaries<br />

diagnosed with OSA who benefit from CPAP.<br />

Response: We disagree. While Stark and other<br />

statutes and rules, including the Federal anti-kickback<br />

statute, afford some protections, we believe this<br />

regulation to be necessary in order to further protect<br />

Medicare beneficiaries from potential abusive practices and<br />

to further reduce the Medicare program’s vulnerability to<br />

741

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!