19.02.2013 Views

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>CMS</strong>-1403-FC<br />

The attended facility- based PSG testing paradigm may<br />

include same night initiation and titration of CPAP<br />

treatment. The final rule provides an exception for<br />

attended facility-based PSG. Thus, we believe that the<br />

exception provides a reasonable option should the<br />

beneficiary’s treating physician determine that there is a<br />

pressing need for urgent treatment in the case of an<br />

individual beneficiary.<br />

Comment: Several commenters believe that the adoption<br />

of this rule would cause disruptions in care of OSA<br />

treatments for patients in rural areas by imposing new<br />

restrictions. These commenters expressed wishes for a<br />

Stark-like rural exception, based on access to care<br />

arguments.<br />

Response: Though various commenters have compared the<br />

provisions of this rule to the “Stark” rules, this rule is<br />

distinct from Stark and addresses separate concerns.<br />

We acknowledge that rural beneficiaries are more<br />

likely to live at greater distances from sleep facilities.<br />

Thus, these beneficiaries would be more likely to avail<br />

themselves of home sleep testing if it were available.<br />

We also note that the final rule allows an exception<br />

for attended facility-based PSG. Thus, when compared to<br />

Medicare coverage before the March 2008 NCD expansion, the<br />

740

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!