19.02.2013 Views

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>CMS</strong>-1403-FC<br />

supplier separately. However, we are unaware of any<br />

current model that would encompass both under a single<br />

accreditation certificate. One commenter estimated that it<br />

would take approximately 6 months to develop such an<br />

accreditation framework. We expect that it would take<br />

1 to 2 years to implement and accredit sufficient programs<br />

to make this a viable alternative.<br />

Ideally, we would like to require that all entities<br />

that furnish both sleep testing and CPAP be accredited. We<br />

solicit public input on accreditation models that might<br />

support this option. Once we are made aware of appropriate<br />

accrediting models, we may readdress this issue in future<br />

rulemaking.<br />

Comment: Several commenters expressed concern<br />

regarding the delays from time of OSA diagnosis to time of<br />

CPAP treatment that might arise if the beneficiary is<br />

supplied CPAP from an unaffiliated supplier. The<br />

commenters believe that this will have an adverse impact on<br />

the patient and will affect their follow through related to<br />

the plan of care.<br />

Response: OSA is not an acute condition. We are not<br />

aware of credible evidence of serious harm due to delay of<br />

days or weeks between OSA diagnosis and CPAP treatment.<br />

739

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!