Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ... Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

healthcare.philips.com
from healthcare.philips.com More from this publisher
19.02.2013 Views

CMS-1403-FC Comment: Several commenters state that the best models utilize high degrees of coordination and affiliation. The commenters claim that integrated care models result in higher CPAP compliance and better quality of care for the patient. The commenters state that the proposed rule would force integrated sleep management programs to refer beneficiaries to outside entities for the CPAP device, thus creating a break in continuity and accountability. During the public comment period on the proposed rule, several institutional stakeholders noted that if finalized unchanged, the regulation would essentially eliminate integrated sleep management programs that furnish coordinated management of OSA from testing to therapy including provision of CPAP. The commenters claimed that these programs, all facility-based, provide a level of patient support in ensuring appropriate provision and titration of CPAP that is not typical with many DME suppliers. These programs note that under this scenario they would have reduced ability to monitor the beneficiary’s compliance with CPAP, including ensuring that the CPAP device has been and continues to be optimized for the individual beneficiary. The commenters believe that finalization of the proposed rule would remove this option, 734

CMS-1403-FC thus they believe leading to fragmented care, loss of accountability and potential harm to patients. Response: Integrated sleep management programs furnish comprehensive diagnostic and therapeutic services with a single coordinated program that commonly includes ongoing assessment of the patient’s response to therapy and modifications to therapy as needed. If finalized as proposed, the regulation would likely result in these programs referring all beneficiaries to outside DME suppliers for the CPAP device, thus creating a break in continuity of care. This concern, which we recognize with attended facility-based PSG furnished in integrated sleep management programs, is not applicable outside of this setting. There is no substantive claim of continuity of care and coordinated disease management in other settings where a sleep test provider may have some other relationship with a DME supplier. Our administrative contractors informed us that they have not historically found these integrated sleep management programs furnishing attended facility-based PSG to be a significant vulnerability. We cannot at this time confidently exclude the possibility that disrupting this model of care might be harmful to some patients. To avoid 735

<strong>CMS</strong>-1403-FC<br />

thus they believe leading to fragmented care, loss of<br />

accountability and potential harm to patients.<br />

Response: Integrated sleep management programs<br />

furnish comprehensive diagnostic and therapeutic services<br />

with a single coordinated program that commonly includes<br />

ongoing assessment of the patient’s response to therapy and<br />

modifications to therapy as needed.<br />

If finalized as proposed, the regulation would likely<br />

result in these programs referring all beneficiaries to<br />

outside DME suppliers for the CPAP device, thus creating a<br />

break in continuity of care.<br />

<strong>This</strong> concern, which we recognize with attended<br />

facility-based PSG furnished in integrated sleep management<br />

programs, is not applicable outside of this setting. There<br />

is no substantive claim of continuity of care and<br />

coordinated disease management in other settings where a<br />

sleep test provider may have some other relationship with a<br />

DME supplier.<br />

Our administrative contractors informed us that they<br />

have not historically found these integrated sleep<br />

management programs furnishing attended facility-based PSG<br />

to be a significant vulnerability. We cannot at this time<br />

confidently exclude the possibility that disrupting this<br />

model of care might be harmful to some patients. To avoid<br />

735

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!