Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...
Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ... Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...
CMS-1403-FC Comment: Several commenters state that the best models utilize high degrees of coordination and affiliation. The commenters claim that integrated care models result in higher CPAP compliance and better quality of care for the patient. The commenters state that the proposed rule would force integrated sleep management programs to refer beneficiaries to outside entities for the CPAP device, thus creating a break in continuity and accountability. During the public comment period on the proposed rule, several institutional stakeholders noted that if finalized unchanged, the regulation would essentially eliminate integrated sleep management programs that furnish coordinated management of OSA from testing to therapy including provision of CPAP. The commenters claimed that these programs, all facility-based, provide a level of patient support in ensuring appropriate provision and titration of CPAP that is not typical with many DME suppliers. These programs note that under this scenario they would have reduced ability to monitor the beneficiary’s compliance with CPAP, including ensuring that the CPAP device has been and continues to be optimized for the individual beneficiary. The commenters believe that finalization of the proposed rule would remove this option, 734
CMS-1403-FC thus they believe leading to fragmented care, loss of accountability and potential harm to patients. Response: Integrated sleep management programs furnish comprehensive diagnostic and therapeutic services with a single coordinated program that commonly includes ongoing assessment of the patient’s response to therapy and modifications to therapy as needed. If finalized as proposed, the regulation would likely result in these programs referring all beneficiaries to outside DME suppliers for the CPAP device, thus creating a break in continuity of care. This concern, which we recognize with attended facility-based PSG furnished in integrated sleep management programs, is not applicable outside of this setting. There is no substantive claim of continuity of care and coordinated disease management in other settings where a sleep test provider may have some other relationship with a DME supplier. Our administrative contractors informed us that they have not historically found these integrated sleep management programs furnishing attended facility-based PSG to be a significant vulnerability. We cannot at this time confidently exclude the possibility that disrupting this model of care might be harmful to some patients. To avoid 735
- Page 683 and 684: CMS-1403-FC The measure becomes app
- Page 685 and 686: CMS-1403-FC is, Measure #125) appli
- Page 687 and 688: CMS-1403-FC outpatient setting. Whi
- Page 689 and 690: CMS-1403-FC ability of an electroni
- Page 691 and 692: CMS-1403-FC October 2005 (hereinaft
- Page 693 and 694: CMS-1403-FC We are aware that there
- Page 695 and 696: CMS-1403-FC provided during the enc
- Page 697 and 698: CMS-1403-FC denominator of a measur
- Page 699 and 700: CMS-1403-FC cases. If the is determ
- Page 701 and 702: CMS-1403-FC during 2009; and (3) wh
- Page 703 and 704: CMS-1403-FC on this quality measure
- Page 705 and 706: CMS-1403-FC become effective until
- Page 707 and 708: CMS-1403-FC and CY 2007 PFS final r
- Page 709 and 710: CMS-1403-FC directly affected by th
- Page 711 and 712: CMS-1403-FC requires advanced pract
- Page 713 and 714: CMS-1403-FC applaud CMS for recogni
- Page 715 and 716: CMS-1403-FC standardization of DNP
- Page 717 and 718: CMS-1403-FC for the most part, been
- Page 719 and 720: CMS-1403-FC that the requirement fo
- Page 721 and 722: CMS-1403-FC degree in radiologic te
- Page 723 and 724: CMS-1403-FC the physicians that fur
- Page 725 and 726: CMS-1403-FC is associated with a te
- Page 727 and 728: CMS-1403-FC facility in which a tec
- Page 729 and 730: CMS-1403-FC by the Medicare program
- Page 731 and 732: CMS-1403-FC pressure (CPAP)” and
- Page 733: CMS-1403-FC for example chronic obs
- Page 737 and 738: CMS-1403-FC Excepting attended faci
- Page 739 and 740: CMS-1403-FC supplier separately. Ho
- Page 741 and 742: CMS-1403-FC final rule’s provisio
- Page 743 and 744: CMS-1403-FC as a DME supplier and p
- Page 745 and 746: CMS-1403-FC Moreover, given our gen
- Page 747 and 748: CMS-1403-FC resources and infrastru
- Page 749 and 750: CMS-1403-FC Comment: Several commen
- Page 751 and 752: CMS-1403-FC organization through a
- Page 753 and 754: CMS-1403-FC After reviewing the pub
- Page 755 and 756: CMS-1403-FC the nonparticipating ho
- Page 757 and 758: CMS-1403-FC be costly and burdensom
- Page 759 and 760: CMS-1403-FC adopting our proposal t
- Page 761 and 762: CMS-1403-FC We are not persuaded to
- Page 763 and 764: CMS-1403-FC §424.36(b)(6)(ii)(C)(2
- Page 765 and 766: CMS-1403-FC be made to obtain the s
- Page 767 and 768: CMS-1403-FC willing to sign at the
- Page 769 and 770: CMS-1403-FC and not suppliers, may
- Page 771 and 772: CMS-1403-FC crew member would have
- Page 773 and 774: CMS-1403-FC In order to determine f
- Page 775 and 776: CMS-1403-FC retrieval of the variou
- Page 777 and 778: CMS-1403-FC plan that demonstrates
- Page 779 and 780: CMS-1403-FC conviction, license sus
- Page 781 and 782: CMS-1403-FC The following is a summ
- Page 783 and 784: CMS-1403-FC faith reduces the time
<strong>CMS</strong>-1403-FC<br />
thus they believe leading to fragmented care, loss of<br />
accountability and potential harm to patients.<br />
Response: Integrated sleep management programs<br />
furnish comprehensive diagnostic and therapeutic services<br />
with a single coordinated program that commonly includes<br />
ongoing assessment of the patient’s response to therapy and<br />
modifications to therapy as needed.<br />
If finalized as proposed, the regulation would likely<br />
result in these programs referring all beneficiaries to<br />
outside DME suppliers for the CPAP device, thus creating a<br />
break in continuity of care.<br />
<strong>This</strong> concern, which we recognize with attended<br />
facility-based PSG furnished in integrated sleep management<br />
programs, is not applicable outside of this setting. There<br />
is no substantive claim of continuity of care and<br />
coordinated disease management in other settings where a<br />
sleep test provider may have some other relationship with a<br />
DME supplier.<br />
Our administrative contractors informed us that they<br />
have not historically found these integrated sleep<br />
management programs furnishing attended facility-based PSG<br />
to be a significant vulnerability. We cannot at this time<br />
confidently exclude the possibility that disrupting this<br />
model of care might be harmful to some patients. To avoid<br />
735