Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...
Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ... Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...
CMS-1403-FC Response: We agree that certification by the ARRT is widely recognized; however, ARRT certification is voluntary, and therefore, may not be required as a condition of employment. Requiring ARRT certification would present an additional expense and testing obligation that individuals who are otherwise qualified might not choose to incur. Such a requirement would also make it necessary for those who are already working in the field to obtain ARRT certification if they are not already certified. The goal of our proposed revision was to update our regulations to reflect the accurate accrediting entity and program requirements for x-ray technology programs. As it stood, the regulation was inaccurate by referencing organizations that no longer approve and accredit x-ray technology programs, and by specifying an outdated 24-month program requirement. It was not our intention to consider imposing new or additional qualification requirements for technicians. In accordance with existing regulations, we will continue to recognize as qualified those individuals who have successfully completed a program of formal training in x-ray technology in a school approved by the JRCERT, as well as those who have earned a bachelor’s or associate 720
CMS-1403-FC degree in radiologic technology from an accredited college or university. States will continue to have the autonomy to utilize the ARRT exam for State licensing purposes. After reviewing the public comments, we are finalizing the provisions as proposed. S. Other Issues 1. Physician Certification (G0180) and Recertification (G0179) for Medicare-Covered Home Health Services under a Home Health Plan of Care (POC) in the Home Health Prospective Payment System (HH PPS) In the CY 2009 PFS proposed rule (73 FR 38578), we solicited public comments on policy options regarding physician involvement in the certification and recertification for Medicare-covered home health services under a home health plans of care (POC), payment for those services, and the basis for those payments (relative resources measured in RVUs). Currently, we pay physicians for both the certification and recertification of home health POCs under HCPCS codes G0180 and G01779, respectively. We make payment for these services through the PFS. In the CY 2009 PFS proposed rule, we expressed our concern that physician involvement in the home health POC may not be as extensive as we had hoped. We recognize that 721
- Page 669 and 670: CMS-1403-FC patients, families, and
- Page 671 and 672: CMS-1403-FC that have satisfactoril
- Page 673 and 674: CMS-1403-FC e-prescribing quality m
- Page 675 and 676: CMS-1403-FC Douglas S. and Friedman
- Page 677 and 678: CMS-1403-FC subsequent year, if the
- Page 679 and 680: CMS-1403-FC eligible professional f
- Page 681 and 682: CMS-1403-FC and is included in the
- Page 683 and 684: CMS-1403-FC The measure becomes app
- Page 685 and 686: CMS-1403-FC is, Measure #125) appli
- Page 687 and 688: CMS-1403-FC outpatient setting. Whi
- Page 689 and 690: CMS-1403-FC ability of an electroni
- Page 691 and 692: CMS-1403-FC October 2005 (hereinaft
- Page 693 and 694: CMS-1403-FC We are aware that there
- Page 695 and 696: CMS-1403-FC provided during the enc
- Page 697 and 698: CMS-1403-FC denominator of a measur
- Page 699 and 700: CMS-1403-FC cases. If the is determ
- Page 701 and 702: CMS-1403-FC during 2009; and (3) wh
- Page 703 and 704: CMS-1403-FC on this quality measure
- Page 705 and 706: CMS-1403-FC become effective until
- Page 707 and 708: CMS-1403-FC and CY 2007 PFS final r
- Page 709 and 710: CMS-1403-FC directly affected by th
- Page 711 and 712: CMS-1403-FC requires advanced pract
- Page 713 and 714: CMS-1403-FC applaud CMS for recogni
- Page 715 and 716: CMS-1403-FC standardization of DNP
- Page 717 and 718: CMS-1403-FC for the most part, been
- Page 719: CMS-1403-FC that the requirement fo
- Page 723 and 724: CMS-1403-FC the physicians that fur
- Page 725 and 726: CMS-1403-FC is associated with a te
- Page 727 and 728: CMS-1403-FC facility in which a tec
- Page 729 and 730: CMS-1403-FC by the Medicare program
- Page 731 and 732: CMS-1403-FC pressure (CPAP)” and
- Page 733 and 734: CMS-1403-FC for example chronic obs
- Page 735 and 736: CMS-1403-FC thus they believe leadi
- Page 737 and 738: CMS-1403-FC Excepting attended faci
- Page 739 and 740: CMS-1403-FC supplier separately. Ho
- Page 741 and 742: CMS-1403-FC final rule’s provisio
- Page 743 and 744: CMS-1403-FC as a DME supplier and p
- Page 745 and 746: CMS-1403-FC Moreover, given our gen
- Page 747 and 748: CMS-1403-FC resources and infrastru
- Page 749 and 750: CMS-1403-FC Comment: Several commen
- Page 751 and 752: CMS-1403-FC organization through a
- Page 753 and 754: CMS-1403-FC After reviewing the pub
- Page 755 and 756: CMS-1403-FC the nonparticipating ho
- Page 757 and 758: CMS-1403-FC be costly and burdensom
- Page 759 and 760: CMS-1403-FC adopting our proposal t
- Page 761 and 762: CMS-1403-FC We are not persuaded to
- Page 763 and 764: CMS-1403-FC §424.36(b)(6)(ii)(C)(2
- Page 765 and 766: CMS-1403-FC be made to obtain the s
- Page 767 and 768: CMS-1403-FC willing to sign at the
- Page 769 and 770: CMS-1403-FC and not suppliers, may
<strong>CMS</strong>-1403-FC<br />
Response: We agree that certification by the ARRT is<br />
widely recognized; however, ARRT certification is<br />
voluntary, and therefore, may not be required as a<br />
condition of employment. Requiring ARRT certification<br />
would present an additional expense and testing obligation<br />
that individuals who are otherwise qualified might not<br />
choose to incur. Such a requirement would also make it<br />
necessary for those who are already working in the field to<br />
obtain ARRT certification if they are not already<br />
certified.<br />
The goal of our proposed revision was to update our<br />
regulations to reflect the accurate accrediting entity and<br />
program requirements for x-ray technology programs. As it<br />
stood, the regulation was inaccurate by referencing<br />
organizations that no longer approve and accredit x-ray<br />
technology programs, and by specifying an outdated 24-month<br />
program requirement. It was not our intention to consider<br />
imposing new or additional qualification requirements for<br />
technicians.<br />
In accordance with existing regulations, we will<br />
continue to recognize as qualified those individuals who<br />
have successfully completed a program of formal training in<br />
x-ray technology in a school <strong>approved</strong> by the JRCERT, as<br />
well as those who have earned a bachelor’s or associate<br />
720