Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...
Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ... Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...
CMS-1403-FC 1-year period. We intend to provide a detailed analysis of BN and the proposed offset during the CY 2010 PFS rulemaking process. The following is a summary of the public comments we received and our responses. Comment: We received one comment concerning the methodology for determining BN. The commenter stated that the Congressional intent for implementing BN is clearly spelled out in section 651(f)1)A)of the MMA. The commenter believes the demonstration’s costs should be offset from the totality of services payable under the Part B Trust Fund, and not a discrete minority of services. The commenter stated that our methodology is flawed because it offsets demonstration costs only from existing chiropractic services. Response: Section 651(f)1)A) of the MMA requires that “* * * the Secretary shall ensure that the aggregate payment made by the Secretary under the Medicare program do not exceed the amount which the Secretary would have paid under the Medicare program if the demonstration projects under this section were not implemented.” The statute does not specify a specific methodology for ensuring BN. Our methodology meets the statutory requirement for BN and appropriately impacts the chiropractic profession that is 708
CMS-1403-FC directly affected by the demonstration. The BN adjustment under PFS will be limited to adjusting the chiropractor fee schedule codes (comprised of the 3 currently covered CPT codes: 98940, 98941, and 98942). No other codes would be affected. Q. Educational Requirements for Nurse Practitioners and Clinical Nurse Specialists In the CY 2009 PFS proposed rule (73 FR 38576), we proposed a technical correction to the nurse practitioner (NP) qualifications at §410.75(b) to require that, in order for NP services furnished by an individual to be covered by Medicare, a NP who obtains Medicare billing privileges as a NP for the first time on or after January 1, 2003, must meet all of the following criteria: (1) be a registered professional nurse who is authorized by State law to practice as a NP; (2) be nationally certified as a NP; and (3) have a master’s degree in nursing. The current NP qualification standards in our regulations include progressive requirements that are not entirely date specific. The absence of a date specification for each of the qualification standards could allow nurses who have never been enrolled under Medicare and obtained Medicare billing privileges as a NP an opportunity to enroll as a NP after January 1, 2003, without a master’s degree in 709
- Page 657 and 658: CMS-1403-FC results, for this purpo
- Page 659 and 660: CMS-1403-FC informed decision-makin
- Page 661 and 662: CMS-1403-FC Comment: Several commen
- Page 663 and 664: CMS-1403-FC prior commitments that
- Page 665 and 666: CMS-1403-FC groups who successfully
- Page 667 and 668: CMS-1403-FC ● Eligible profession
- Page 669 and 670: CMS-1403-FC patients, families, and
- Page 671 and 672: CMS-1403-FC that have satisfactoril
- Page 673 and 674: CMS-1403-FC e-prescribing quality m
- Page 675 and 676: CMS-1403-FC Douglas S. and Friedman
- Page 677 and 678: CMS-1403-FC subsequent year, if the
- Page 679 and 680: CMS-1403-FC eligible professional f
- Page 681 and 682: CMS-1403-FC and is included in the
- Page 683 and 684: CMS-1403-FC The measure becomes app
- Page 685 and 686: CMS-1403-FC is, Measure #125) appli
- Page 687 and 688: CMS-1403-FC outpatient setting. Whi
- Page 689 and 690: CMS-1403-FC ability of an electroni
- Page 691 and 692: CMS-1403-FC October 2005 (hereinaft
- Page 693 and 694: CMS-1403-FC We are aware that there
- Page 695 and 696: CMS-1403-FC provided during the enc
- Page 697 and 698: CMS-1403-FC denominator of a measur
- Page 699 and 700: CMS-1403-FC cases. If the is determ
- Page 701 and 702: CMS-1403-FC during 2009; and (3) wh
- Page 703 and 704: CMS-1403-FC on this quality measure
- Page 705 and 706: CMS-1403-FC become effective until
- Page 707: CMS-1403-FC and CY 2007 PFS final r
- Page 711 and 712: CMS-1403-FC requires advanced pract
- Page 713 and 714: CMS-1403-FC applaud CMS for recogni
- Page 715 and 716: CMS-1403-FC standardization of DNP
- Page 717 and 718: CMS-1403-FC for the most part, been
- Page 719 and 720: CMS-1403-FC that the requirement fo
- Page 721 and 722: CMS-1403-FC degree in radiologic te
- Page 723 and 724: CMS-1403-FC the physicians that fur
- Page 725 and 726: CMS-1403-FC is associated with a te
- Page 727 and 728: CMS-1403-FC facility in which a tec
- Page 729 and 730: CMS-1403-FC by the Medicare program
- Page 731 and 732: CMS-1403-FC pressure (CPAP)” and
- Page 733 and 734: CMS-1403-FC for example chronic obs
- Page 735 and 736: CMS-1403-FC thus they believe leadi
- Page 737 and 738: CMS-1403-FC Excepting attended faci
- Page 739 and 740: CMS-1403-FC supplier separately. Ho
- Page 741 and 742: CMS-1403-FC final rule’s provisio
- Page 743 and 744: CMS-1403-FC as a DME supplier and p
- Page 745 and 746: CMS-1403-FC Moreover, given our gen
- Page 747 and 748: CMS-1403-FC resources and infrastru
- Page 749 and 750: CMS-1403-FC Comment: Several commen
- Page 751 and 752: CMS-1403-FC organization through a
- Page 753 and 754: CMS-1403-FC After reviewing the pub
- Page 755 and 756: CMS-1403-FC the nonparticipating ho
- Page 757 and 758: CMS-1403-FC be costly and burdensom
<strong>CMS</strong>-1403-FC<br />
1-year period. We intend to provide a detailed analysis of<br />
BN and the proposed offset during the CY 2010 PFS<br />
rulemaking process.<br />
The following is a summary of the public comments we<br />
received and our responses.<br />
Comment: We received one comment concerning the<br />
methodology for determining BN. The commenter stated that<br />
the Congressional intent for implementing BN is clearly<br />
spelled out in section 651(f)1)A)of the MMA. The commenter<br />
believes the demonstration’s costs should be offset from<br />
the totality of services payable under the Part B Trust<br />
Fund, and not a discrete minority of services. The<br />
commenter stated that our methodology is flawed because it<br />
offsets demonstration costs only from existing chiropractic<br />
services.<br />
Response: Section 651(f)1)A) of the MMA requires that<br />
“* * * the Secretary shall ensure that the aggregate<br />
payment made by the Secretary under the Medicare program do<br />
not exceed the amount which the Secretary would have paid<br />
under the Medicare program if the demonstration projects<br />
under this section were not implemented.” The statute does<br />
not specify a specific methodology for ensuring BN. Our<br />
methodology meets the statutory requirement for BN and<br />
appropriately impacts the chiropractic profession that is<br />
708