Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ... Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

healthcare.philips.com
from healthcare.philips.com More from this publisher
19.02.2013 Views

CMS-1403-FC of the 2009 e-prescribing incentive program no later than December 31, 2008. Comment: A few commenters objected to the fact that there is no definition as to what constitutes an acceptable hardship exemption for the e-prescribing incentive initiative. Response: As discussed briefly above, section 1848(a)(5)(A) of the Act, as added by the MIPPA, authorizes the Secretary, starting in 2012, to apply a differential fee schedule amount for covered professional services furnished by an eligible professional who is not a successful electronic prescriber. In accordance with section 1848(a)(5)(B) of the Act, the Secretary may, on a case-by-case basis, exempt an eligible professional from the application of the payment differential if the Secretary “determines, subject to annual renewal, that compliance with the requirement for being a successful electronic prescriber would result in a significant hardship.” This hardship exemption is to be used at the discretion of the Secretary. Since this hardship exemption pertains only to those eligible professionals subject to a payment differential because they did not meet the criteria for becoming a successful electronic prescriber, this provision will not 704

CMS-1403-FC become effective until 2012 when the payment differential for those eligible professionals who are not successful electronic prescribers is first required. As such, the definition of what constitutes an acceptable hardship is beyond the scope of this final rule with comment period. 705

<strong>CMS</strong>-1403-FC<br />

of the 2009 e-prescribing incentive program no later than<br />

December 31, 2008.<br />

Comment: A few commenters objected to the fact that<br />

there is no definition as to what constitutes an acceptable<br />

hardship exemption for the e-prescribing incentive<br />

initiative.<br />

Response: As discussed briefly above, section<br />

1848(a)(5)(A) of the Act, as added by the MIPPA, authorizes<br />

the Secretary, starting in 2012, to apply a differential<br />

fee schedule amount for covered professional services<br />

furnished by an eligible professional who is not a<br />

successful electronic prescriber. In accordance with<br />

section 1848(a)(5)(B) of the Act, the Secretary may, on a<br />

case-by-case basis, exempt an eligible professional from<br />

the application of the payment differential if the<br />

Secretary “determines, subject to annual renewal, that<br />

compliance with the requirement for being a successful<br />

electronic prescriber would result in a significant<br />

hardship.” <strong>This</strong> hardship exemption is to be used at the<br />

discretion of the Secretary.<br />

Since this hardship exemption pertains only to those<br />

eligible professionals subject to a payment differential<br />

because they did not meet the criteria for becoming a<br />

successful electronic prescriber, this provision will not<br />

704

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!