Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...
Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ... Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...
CMS-1403-FC of the 2009 e-prescribing incentive program no later than December 31, 2008. Comment: A few commenters objected to the fact that there is no definition as to what constitutes an acceptable hardship exemption for the e-prescribing incentive initiative. Response: As discussed briefly above, section 1848(a)(5)(A) of the Act, as added by the MIPPA, authorizes the Secretary, starting in 2012, to apply a differential fee schedule amount for covered professional services furnished by an eligible professional who is not a successful electronic prescriber. In accordance with section 1848(a)(5)(B) of the Act, the Secretary may, on a case-by-case basis, exempt an eligible professional from the application of the payment differential if the Secretary “determines, subject to annual renewal, that compliance with the requirement for being a successful electronic prescriber would result in a significant hardship.” This hardship exemption is to be used at the discretion of the Secretary. Since this hardship exemption pertains only to those eligible professionals subject to a payment differential because they did not meet the criteria for becoming a successful electronic prescriber, this provision will not 704
CMS-1403-FC become effective until 2012 when the payment differential for those eligible professionals who are not successful electronic prescribers is first required. As such, the definition of what constitutes an acceptable hardship is beyond the scope of this final rule with comment period. 705
- Page 653 and 654: CMS-1403-FC proposed HIV/AIDS measu
- Page 655 and 656: CMS-1403-FC set of denominator spec
- Page 657 and 658: CMS-1403-FC results, for this purpo
- Page 659 and 660: CMS-1403-FC informed decision-makin
- Page 661 and 662: CMS-1403-FC Comment: Several commen
- Page 663 and 664: CMS-1403-FC prior commitments that
- Page 665 and 666: CMS-1403-FC groups who successfully
- Page 667 and 668: CMS-1403-FC ● Eligible profession
- Page 669 and 670: CMS-1403-FC patients, families, and
- Page 671 and 672: CMS-1403-FC that have satisfactoril
- Page 673 and 674: CMS-1403-FC e-prescribing quality m
- Page 675 and 676: CMS-1403-FC Douglas S. and Friedman
- Page 677 and 678: CMS-1403-FC subsequent year, if the
- Page 679 and 680: CMS-1403-FC eligible professional f
- Page 681 and 682: CMS-1403-FC and is included in the
- Page 683 and 684: CMS-1403-FC The measure becomes app
- Page 685 and 686: CMS-1403-FC is, Measure #125) appli
- Page 687 and 688: CMS-1403-FC outpatient setting. Whi
- Page 689 and 690: CMS-1403-FC ability of an electroni
- Page 691 and 692: CMS-1403-FC October 2005 (hereinaft
- Page 693 and 694: CMS-1403-FC We are aware that there
- Page 695 and 696: CMS-1403-FC provided during the enc
- Page 697 and 698: CMS-1403-FC denominator of a measur
- Page 699 and 700: CMS-1403-FC cases. If the is determ
- Page 701 and 702: CMS-1403-FC during 2009; and (3) wh
- Page 703: CMS-1403-FC on this quality measure
- Page 707 and 708: CMS-1403-FC and CY 2007 PFS final r
- Page 709 and 710: CMS-1403-FC directly affected by th
- Page 711 and 712: CMS-1403-FC requires advanced pract
- Page 713 and 714: CMS-1403-FC applaud CMS for recogni
- Page 715 and 716: CMS-1403-FC standardization of DNP
- Page 717 and 718: CMS-1403-FC for the most part, been
- Page 719 and 720: CMS-1403-FC that the requirement fo
- Page 721 and 722: CMS-1403-FC degree in radiologic te
- Page 723 and 724: CMS-1403-FC the physicians that fur
- Page 725 and 726: CMS-1403-FC is associated with a te
- Page 727 and 728: CMS-1403-FC facility in which a tec
- Page 729 and 730: CMS-1403-FC by the Medicare program
- Page 731 and 732: CMS-1403-FC pressure (CPAP)” and
- Page 733 and 734: CMS-1403-FC for example chronic obs
- Page 735 and 736: CMS-1403-FC thus they believe leadi
- Page 737 and 738: CMS-1403-FC Excepting attended faci
- Page 739 and 740: CMS-1403-FC supplier separately. Ho
- Page 741 and 742: CMS-1403-FC final rule’s provisio
- Page 743 and 744: CMS-1403-FC as a DME supplier and p
- Page 745 and 746: CMS-1403-FC Moreover, given our gen
- Page 747 and 748: CMS-1403-FC resources and infrastru
- Page 749 and 750: CMS-1403-FC Comment: Several commen
- Page 751 and 752: CMS-1403-FC organization through a
- Page 753 and 754: CMS-1403-FC After reviewing the pub
<strong>CMS</strong>-1403-FC<br />
of the 2009 e-prescribing incentive program no later than<br />
December 31, 2008.<br />
Comment: A few commenters objected to the fact that<br />
there is no definition as to what constitutes an acceptable<br />
hardship exemption for the e-prescribing incentive<br />
initiative.<br />
Response: As discussed briefly above, section<br />
1848(a)(5)(A) of the Act, as added by the MIPPA, authorizes<br />
the Secretary, starting in 2012, to apply a differential<br />
fee schedule amount for covered professional services<br />
furnished by an eligible professional who is not a<br />
successful electronic prescriber. In accordance with<br />
section 1848(a)(5)(B) of the Act, the Secretary may, on a<br />
case-by-case basis, exempt an eligible professional from<br />
the application of the payment differential if the<br />
Secretary “determines, subject to annual renewal, that<br />
compliance with the requirement for being a successful<br />
electronic prescriber would result in a significant<br />
hardship.” <strong>This</strong> hardship exemption is to be used at the<br />
discretion of the Secretary.<br />
Since this hardship exemption pertains only to those<br />
eligible professionals subject to a payment differential<br />
because they did not meet the criteria for becoming a<br />
successful electronic prescriber, this provision will not<br />
704