19.02.2013 Views

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>CMS</strong>-1403-FC<br />

outpatient setting. While outpatient services are an<br />

imperfect marker, outpatient services are likely to<br />

represent the largest opportunity to expand electronic<br />

prescribing where prescribing is frequent and the decision<br />

to adopt electronic prescribing systems is also dependent<br />

on the choices, practices and funding by eligible<br />

professionals. Fourth, the statutory limitation that<br />

applies to eligibility for the incentive also applies to<br />

the future differential payment provisions. Extension of<br />

the denominator codes to hospital-based settings of care,<br />

may cause professionals who exclusively practice in such<br />

settings to be liable for a differential payment for<br />

services furnished in a setting where they have limited<br />

ability to influence the adoption of electronic<br />

prescribing.<br />

ii. Qualified Electronic Prescribing System – Required<br />

Functionalities and Part D E-Prescribing Standards<br />

To report Measure #125 the eligible professional must<br />

report one of three “G” codes, as will be discussed below,<br />

on the same claim for which one of the denominator codes is<br />

billed. In reporting any of the G codes, however, and<br />

thereby qualifying for the incentive payment for<br />

e-prescribing in 2009, the professional must have and<br />

regularly use a “qualified” electronic prescribing system<br />

687

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!