Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...
Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ... Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...
CMS-1403-FC MMA, also permitted third parties to offset the implementation costs for electronic prescribing by authorizing the creation of an exception to the physician self-referral (“Stark”) prohibition for certain donations of electronic prescribing technology. This enabled health plans, hospitals, and medical groups to provide in-kind support to physicians for electronic prescribing. Furthermore the MMA authorized the creation of a “safe harbor” to protect these entities from prosecution under the anti-kickback statute. There are many potential advantages to e-prescribing. These advantages include, but are not limited, to: ● Improving patient safety and quality of care by (reducing medication errors by up to 86 percent): faxing; history; ○ Reducing illegibility. ○ Reducing oral miscommunications. ○ Providing warnings and alert systems ○ Providing access to patient’s medication ● Reducing time spent on pharmacy phone calls and ● Automation of renewals and authorization; ● Improving formulary adherence (from 14 percent to 88 percent after e-prescribing implementation) (Bell, 674
CMS-1403-FC Douglas S. and Friedman, Maria A. “E-Prescribing and the Medicare Modernization Act of 2008.” Health Affairs. 2005; Volume 24, no.5: 1159-1169.); and ● Improving drug surveillance/recall; A more detailed description of the benefits of e-prescribing can be found by clicking on the Clinician’s Guide to Electronic Prescribing link at http://www.ehealthinitiative.org/. Many of these advantages were also discussed at a recent e-prescribing conference co-sponsored by CMS. Downloadable information from this conference is available at http://www.e- prescribingconference.com. Although there are many benefits to electronic prescribing, there has been limited adoption and use of electronic prescribing by physicians and other professionals who prescribe medications. It is estimated that only 5 to 18 percent of providers currently use e-prescribing (Bell, Douglas S. and Friedman, Maria A. “E- Prescribing and the Medicare Modernization Act of 2008.” Health Affairs. 2005; Volume 24, no.5: 1159-1169.). The enactment of the MIPPA in July, 2008, should encourage significant expansion of the use of electronic prescribing by authorizing a combination of financial incentives and payment differentials. Financial incentives are available 675
- Page 623 and 624: CMS-1403-FC measures. We consider t
- Page 625 and 626: CMS-1403-FC Measure Number and Titl
- Page 627 and 628: CMS-1403-FC Measure Number and Titl
- Page 629 and 630: CMS-1403-FC ● Measure #120 CKD: A
- Page 631 and 632: CMS-1403-FC For the 2009 PQRI quali
- Page 633 and 634: CMS-1403-FC rule indicated that the
- Page 635 and 636: CMS-1403-FC Response: As suggested
- Page 637 and 638: CMS-1403-FC required for the measur
- Page 639 and 640: CMS-1403-FC ● Achievement of NQF
- Page 641 and 642: CMS-1403-FC These additional measur
- Page 643 and 644: CMS-1403-FC We did not include this
- Page 645 and 646: CMS-1403-FC Comment: Many commenter
- Page 647 and 648: CMS-1403-FC groups must have a part
- Page 649 and 650: CMS-1403-FC selected for inclusion
- Page 651 and 652: CMS-1403-FC Measure Title Measure S
- Page 653 and 654: CMS-1403-FC proposed HIV/AIDS measu
- Page 655 and 656: CMS-1403-FC set of denominator spec
- Page 657 and 658: CMS-1403-FC results, for this purpo
- Page 659 and 660: CMS-1403-FC informed decision-makin
- Page 661 and 662: CMS-1403-FC Comment: Several commen
- Page 663 and 664: CMS-1403-FC prior commitments that
- Page 665 and 666: CMS-1403-FC groups who successfully
- Page 667 and 668: CMS-1403-FC ● Eligible profession
- Page 669 and 670: CMS-1403-FC patients, families, and
- Page 671 and 672: CMS-1403-FC that have satisfactoril
- Page 673: CMS-1403-FC e-prescribing quality m
- Page 677 and 678: CMS-1403-FC subsequent year, if the
- Page 679 and 680: CMS-1403-FC eligible professional f
- Page 681 and 682: CMS-1403-FC and is included in the
- Page 683 and 684: CMS-1403-FC The measure becomes app
- Page 685 and 686: CMS-1403-FC is, Measure #125) appli
- Page 687 and 688: CMS-1403-FC outpatient setting. Whi
- Page 689 and 690: CMS-1403-FC ability of an electroni
- Page 691 and 692: CMS-1403-FC October 2005 (hereinaft
- Page 693 and 694: CMS-1403-FC We are aware that there
- Page 695 and 696: CMS-1403-FC provided during the enc
- Page 697 and 698: CMS-1403-FC denominator of a measur
- Page 699 and 700: CMS-1403-FC cases. If the is determ
- Page 701 and 702: CMS-1403-FC during 2009; and (3) wh
- Page 703 and 704: CMS-1403-FC on this quality measure
- Page 705 and 706: CMS-1403-FC become effective until
- Page 707 and 708: CMS-1403-FC and CY 2007 PFS final r
- Page 709 and 710: CMS-1403-FC directly affected by th
- Page 711 and 712: CMS-1403-FC requires advanced pract
- Page 713 and 714: CMS-1403-FC applaud CMS for recogni
- Page 715 and 716: CMS-1403-FC standardization of DNP
- Page 717 and 718: CMS-1403-FC for the most part, been
- Page 719 and 720: CMS-1403-FC that the requirement fo
- Page 721 and 722: CMS-1403-FC degree in radiologic te
- Page 723 and 724: CMS-1403-FC the physicians that fur
<strong>CMS</strong>-1403-FC<br />
MMA, also permitted third parties to offset the<br />
implementation costs for electronic prescribing by<br />
authorizing the creation of an exception to the physician<br />
self-referral (“Stark”) prohibition for certain donations<br />
of electronic prescribing technology. <strong>This</strong> enabled health<br />
plans, hospitals, and medical groups to provide in-kind<br />
support to physicians for electronic prescribing.<br />
Furthermore the MMA authorized the creation of a “safe<br />
harbor” to protect these entities from prosecution under<br />
the anti-kickback statute.<br />
There are many potential advantages to e-prescribing.<br />
These advantages include, but are not limited, to:<br />
● Improving patient safety and quality of care by<br />
(reducing medication errors by up to 86 percent):<br />
faxing;<br />
history;<br />
○ Reducing illegibility.<br />
○ Reducing oral miscommunications.<br />
○ Providing warnings and alert systems<br />
○ Providing access to patient’s medication<br />
● Reducing time spent on pharmacy phone calls and<br />
● Automation of renewals and authorization;<br />
● Improving formulary adherence (from 14 percent to<br />
88 percent after e-prescribing implementation) (Bell,<br />
674