Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...
Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ... Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...
CMS-1403-FC information that commenters specifically requested be made public is beyond the scope of this final rule with comment period, which is limited to the public disclosure of PQRI information. Comment: A few commenters suggested that we limit public reporting of PQRI information to the names of the clinicians and/or group practices that satisfactorily participated and earned an incentive payment. Response: As stated previously, the MIPPA requires us to list the names of eligible professionals (or group practices) who satisfactorily submitted data on quality measures for the PQRI on our Web site. While we agree that information on who satisfactorily submits data on quality measures for the PQRI is useful information to have and plan to list only the names of physicians who satisfactorily participated in the 2009 PQRI and earned an incentive payment, it is our goal to eventually make performance information public as well. We have made information on quality of care in other care settings publicly available and hope to eventually do the same for physicians and other health care practitioners as part of our broader goal to measure and make the quality of care for services furnished to Medicare beneficiaries publicly available. 660
CMS-1403-FC Comment: Several commenters felt that it would be premature to publicly report any information derived from PQRI at this time. Other commenters merely urged CMS to proceed cautiously when creating a Physician Compare Web site using PQRI data. Although some commenters supported limiting the information to be publicly reported to the names of eligible professionals and/or group practices that satisfactorily participate in PQRI and earned the bonus incentive payment, many commenters cited concerns with even listing just the names of participants. Some of the specific concerns cited include: ● Lack of program stability; ● Lack of evidence demonstrating that compliance with pay-for-reporting programs increases quality; ● Lack of evidence to demonstrate the validity of some of the PQRI quality measures; ● Successful participation demonstrates only an eligible professional’s ability to implement a process and is not a measure of quality; ● Publicly reporting PQRI participation information may give beneficiaries or others who visit the Web site the false impression that eligible professionals who participated are practicing higher quality medicine than those who do not participate; 661
- Page 609 and 610: CMS-1403-FC identified in Tables 15
- Page 611 and 612: CMS-1403-FC important difference in
- Page 613 and 614: CMS-1403-FC not use Measures #73 Ca
- Page 615 and 616: CMS-1403-FC measures, but which are
- Page 617 and 618: CMS-1403-FC with comment period. Ho
- Page 619 and 620: CMS-1403-FC ● Measure #41 Osteopo
- Page 621 and 622: CMS-1403-FC professional to simply
- Page 623 and 624: CMS-1403-FC measures. We consider t
- Page 625 and 626: CMS-1403-FC Measure Number and Titl
- Page 627 and 628: CMS-1403-FC Measure Number and Titl
- Page 629 and 630: CMS-1403-FC ● Measure #120 CKD: A
- Page 631 and 632: CMS-1403-FC For the 2009 PQRI quali
- Page 633 and 634: CMS-1403-FC rule indicated that the
- Page 635 and 636: CMS-1403-FC Response: As suggested
- Page 637 and 638: CMS-1403-FC required for the measur
- Page 639 and 640: CMS-1403-FC ● Achievement of NQF
- Page 641 and 642: CMS-1403-FC These additional measur
- Page 643 and 644: CMS-1403-FC We did not include this
- Page 645 and 646: CMS-1403-FC Comment: Many commenter
- Page 647 and 648: CMS-1403-FC groups must have a part
- Page 649 and 650: CMS-1403-FC selected for inclusion
- Page 651 and 652: CMS-1403-FC Measure Title Measure S
- Page 653 and 654: CMS-1403-FC proposed HIV/AIDS measu
- Page 655 and 656: CMS-1403-FC set of denominator spec
- Page 657 and 658: CMS-1403-FC results, for this purpo
- Page 659: CMS-1403-FC informed decision-makin
- Page 663 and 664: CMS-1403-FC prior commitments that
- Page 665 and 666: CMS-1403-FC groups who successfully
- Page 667 and 668: CMS-1403-FC ● Eligible profession
- Page 669 and 670: CMS-1403-FC patients, families, and
- Page 671 and 672: CMS-1403-FC that have satisfactoril
- Page 673 and 674: CMS-1403-FC e-prescribing quality m
- Page 675 and 676: CMS-1403-FC Douglas S. and Friedman
- Page 677 and 678: CMS-1403-FC subsequent year, if the
- Page 679 and 680: CMS-1403-FC eligible professional f
- Page 681 and 682: CMS-1403-FC and is included in the
- Page 683 and 684: CMS-1403-FC The measure becomes app
- Page 685 and 686: CMS-1403-FC is, Measure #125) appli
- Page 687 and 688: CMS-1403-FC outpatient setting. Whi
- Page 689 and 690: CMS-1403-FC ability of an electroni
- Page 691 and 692: CMS-1403-FC October 2005 (hereinaft
- Page 693 and 694: CMS-1403-FC We are aware that there
- Page 695 and 696: CMS-1403-FC provided during the enc
- Page 697 and 698: CMS-1403-FC denominator of a measur
- Page 699 and 700: CMS-1403-FC cases. If the is determ
- Page 701 and 702: CMS-1403-FC during 2009; and (3) wh
- Page 703 and 704: CMS-1403-FC on this quality measure
- Page 705 and 706: CMS-1403-FC become effective until
- Page 707 and 708: CMS-1403-FC and CY 2007 PFS final r
- Page 709 and 710: CMS-1403-FC directly affected by th
<strong>CMS</strong>-1403-FC<br />
information that commenters specifically requested be made<br />
public is beyond the scope of this final rule with comment<br />
period, which is limited to the public disclosure of PQRI<br />
information.<br />
Comment: A few commenters suggested that we limit<br />
public reporting of PQRI information to the names of the<br />
clinicians and/or group practices that satisfactorily<br />
participated and earned an incentive payment.<br />
Response: As stated previously, the MIPPA requires us<br />
to list the names of eligible professionals (or group<br />
practices) who satisfactorily <strong>submitted</strong> data on quality<br />
measures for the PQRI on our Web site. While we agree that<br />
information on who satisfactorily submits data on quality<br />
measures for the PQRI is useful information to have and<br />
plan to list only the names of physicians who<br />
satisfactorily participated in the 2009 PQRI and earned an<br />
incentive payment, it is our goal to eventually make<br />
performance information public as well. We have made<br />
information on quality of care in other care settings<br />
publicly available and hope to eventually do the same for<br />
physicians and other health care practitioners as part of<br />
our broader goal to measure and make the quality of care<br />
for services furnished to Medicare beneficiaries publicly<br />
available.<br />
660