Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...
Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ... Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...
CMS-1403-FC ● CABG: Surgical Re-exploration ● CABG: Anti-platelet Medications at Discharge ● CABG: Beta Blockade at Discharge ● CABG: Lipid Management and Counseling Finally, the following 5 quality measures in Table 18 will be reportable only through registries as individual quality measures for the 2009 PQRI: ● Pediatric ESRD: Adequacy of Hemodialysis ● HIV/AIDS: CD4+ Cell Count or CD4+ Percentage ● HIV/AIDS: Pneumocystis Jiroveci Pneumonia (PCP) Prophylaxis ● HIV/AIDS: Adolescent and Adult Patients with HIV/AIDS who are Prescribed Potent Antiretroviral Therapy ● HIV/AIDS: HIV RNA Control After 6 Months of Potent Antiretroviral Therapy Comment: One commenter suggested that CMS accept as many measures as possible that are based solely on information derived from administrative claims so that professionals would not have to do additional coding. Response: Under the PQRI program eligible professionals are provided an incentive payment for submission of quality data. What is suggested would not involve submission of quality data but merely normal claims submission from which quality inferences would be made. An 610
CMS-1403-FC important difference in that approach to PQRI is that under PQRI, by submitting quality data, the eligible professional indicates that the patient is appropriately attributed to that professional. When purely administrative data are used, attribution rules would need to be applied, with which the physician or other eligible professional may not agree. Thus, focusing on administrative-data based measures only could have the unintended consequence of holding the eligible professional responsible for certain services which the eligible professional might feel are beyond their scope of care for a particular patient. Comment: Several commenters recommended changes to specific quality measures’ titles, definitions, and detailed specifications or coding. Many of these recommendations were based on alternative interpretations of clinical evidence or concerns about the utility of the measures. Some requests were specifically concerned that measures be expanded to include specific professionals to whom the measure may be applicable such as occupational therapists, registered dieticians, and audiologists. Specifically, one commenter suggested that in order to maximize the impact of Measure #1 Diabetes Mellitus: Hemoglobin A1c Poor Control in Diabetes Mellitus, the PQRI specifications should continue to require a performance 611
- Page 559 and 560: CMS-1403-FC registries to report on
- Page 561 and 562: CMS-1403-FC reporting options for r
- Page 563 and 564: CMS-1403-FC incentive payment for P
- Page 565 and 566: CMS-1403-FC to report 2009 PQRI qua
- Page 567 and 568: CMS-1403-FC Comment: We received nu
- Page 569 and 570: CMS-1403-FC Comment: One comment su
- Page 571 and 572: CMS-1403-FC quality measures result
- Page 573 and 574: CMS-1403-FC requirements listed on
- Page 575 and 576: CMS-1403-FC a data submission vendo
- Page 577 and 578: CMS-1403-FC As we stated in the CY
- Page 579 and 580: CMS-1403-FC whether eligible profes
- Page 581 and 582: CMS-1403-FC ● Agree that the regi
- Page 583 and 584: CMS-1403-FC soon thereafter as is t
- Page 585 and 586: CMS-1403-FC Comment: We received ma
- Page 587 and 588: CMS-1403-FC Comment: One commenter
- Page 589 and 590: CMS-1403-FC additional 2.0 percent
- Page 591 and 592: CMS-1403-FC EHRs in 2009. The measu
- Page 593 and 594: CMS-1403-FC i. Overview and Summary
- Page 595 and 596: CMS-1403-FC voluntary consensus sta
- Page 597 and 598: CMS-1403-FC Comment: Several commen
- Page 599 and 600: CMS-1403-FC the AMA-PCPI should be
- Page 601 and 602: CMS-1403-FC are appropriate and do
- Page 603 and 604: CMS-1403-FC to make any changes to
- Page 605 and 606: CMS-1403-FC post the measures for p
- Page 607 and 608: CMS-1403-FC beneficiaries. We now h
- Page 609: CMS-1403-FC identified in Tables 15
- Page 613 and 614: CMS-1403-FC not use Measures #73 Ca
- Page 615 and 616: CMS-1403-FC measures, but which are
- Page 617 and 618: CMS-1403-FC with comment period. Ho
- Page 619 and 620: CMS-1403-FC ● Measure #41 Osteopo
- Page 621 and 622: CMS-1403-FC professional to simply
- Page 623 and 624: CMS-1403-FC measures. We consider t
- Page 625 and 626: CMS-1403-FC Measure Number and Titl
- Page 627 and 628: CMS-1403-FC Measure Number and Titl
- Page 629 and 630: CMS-1403-FC ● Measure #120 CKD: A
- Page 631 and 632: CMS-1403-FC For the 2009 PQRI quali
- Page 633 and 634: CMS-1403-FC rule indicated that the
- Page 635 and 636: CMS-1403-FC Response: As suggested
- Page 637 and 638: CMS-1403-FC required for the measur
- Page 639 and 640: CMS-1403-FC ● Achievement of NQF
- Page 641 and 642: CMS-1403-FC These additional measur
- Page 643 and 644: CMS-1403-FC We did not include this
- Page 645 and 646: CMS-1403-FC Comment: Many commenter
- Page 647 and 648: CMS-1403-FC groups must have a part
- Page 649 and 650: CMS-1403-FC selected for inclusion
- Page 651 and 652: CMS-1403-FC Measure Title Measure S
- Page 653 and 654: CMS-1403-FC proposed HIV/AIDS measu
- Page 655 and 656: CMS-1403-FC set of denominator spec
- Page 657 and 658: CMS-1403-FC results, for this purpo
- Page 659 and 660: CMS-1403-FC informed decision-makin
<strong>CMS</strong>-1403-FC<br />
important difference in that approach to PQRI is that under<br />
PQRI, by submitting quality data, the eligible professional<br />
indicates that the patient is appropriately attributed to<br />
that professional. When purely administrative data are<br />
used, attribution rules would need to be applied, with<br />
which the physician or other eligible professional may not<br />
agree. Thus, focusing on administrative-data based<br />
measures only could have the unintended consequence of<br />
holding the eligible professional responsible for certain<br />
services which the eligible professional might feel are<br />
beyond their scope of care for a particular patient.<br />
Comment: Several commenters recommended changes to<br />
specific quality measures’ titles, definitions, and<br />
detailed specifications or coding. Many of these<br />
recommendations were based on alternative interpretations<br />
of clinical evidence or concerns about the utility of the<br />
measures. Some requests were specifically concerned that<br />
measures be expanded to include specific professionals to<br />
whom the measure may be applicable such as occupational<br />
therapists, registered dieticians, and audiologists.<br />
Specifically, one commenter suggested that in order to<br />
maximize the impact of Measure #1 Diabetes Mellitus:<br />
Hemoglobin A1c Poor Control in Diabetes Mellitus, the PQRI<br />
specifications should continue to require a performance<br />
611