Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ... Notice: This CMS-approved document has been submitted - Philips ...

healthcare.philips.com
from healthcare.philips.com More from this publisher
19.02.2013 Views

CMS-1403-FC ● CABG: Surgical Re-exploration ● CABG: Anti-platelet Medications at Discharge ● CABG: Beta Blockade at Discharge ● CABG: Lipid Management and Counseling Finally, the following 5 quality measures in Table 18 will be reportable only through registries as individual quality measures for the 2009 PQRI: ● Pediatric ESRD: Adequacy of Hemodialysis ● HIV/AIDS: CD4+ Cell Count or CD4+ Percentage ● HIV/AIDS: Pneumocystis Jiroveci Pneumonia (PCP) Prophylaxis ● HIV/AIDS: Adolescent and Adult Patients with HIV/AIDS who are Prescribed Potent Antiretroviral Therapy ● HIV/AIDS: HIV RNA Control After 6 Months of Potent Antiretroviral Therapy Comment: One commenter suggested that CMS accept as many measures as possible that are based solely on information derived from administrative claims so that professionals would not have to do additional coding. Response: Under the PQRI program eligible professionals are provided an incentive payment for submission of quality data. What is suggested would not involve submission of quality data but merely normal claims submission from which quality inferences would be made. An 610

CMS-1403-FC important difference in that approach to PQRI is that under PQRI, by submitting quality data, the eligible professional indicates that the patient is appropriately attributed to that professional. When purely administrative data are used, attribution rules would need to be applied, with which the physician or other eligible professional may not agree. Thus, focusing on administrative-data based measures only could have the unintended consequence of holding the eligible professional responsible for certain services which the eligible professional might feel are beyond their scope of care for a particular patient. Comment: Several commenters recommended changes to specific quality measures’ titles, definitions, and detailed specifications or coding. Many of these recommendations were based on alternative interpretations of clinical evidence or concerns about the utility of the measures. Some requests were specifically concerned that measures be expanded to include specific professionals to whom the measure may be applicable such as occupational therapists, registered dieticians, and audiologists. Specifically, one commenter suggested that in order to maximize the impact of Measure #1 Diabetes Mellitus: Hemoglobin A1c Poor Control in Diabetes Mellitus, the PQRI specifications should continue to require a performance 611

<strong>CMS</strong>-1403-FC<br />

important difference in that approach to PQRI is that under<br />

PQRI, by submitting quality data, the eligible professional<br />

indicates that the patient is appropriately attributed to<br />

that professional. When purely administrative data are<br />

used, attribution rules would need to be applied, with<br />

which the physician or other eligible professional may not<br />

agree. Thus, focusing on administrative-data based<br />

measures only could have the unintended consequence of<br />

holding the eligible professional responsible for certain<br />

services which the eligible professional might feel are<br />

beyond their scope of care for a particular patient.<br />

Comment: Several commenters recommended changes to<br />

specific quality measures’ titles, definitions, and<br />

detailed specifications or coding. Many of these<br />

recommendations were based on alternative interpretations<br />

of clinical evidence or concerns about the utility of the<br />

measures. Some requests were specifically concerned that<br />

measures be expanded to include specific professionals to<br />

whom the measure may be applicable such as occupational<br />

therapists, registered dieticians, and audiologists.<br />

Specifically, one commenter suggested that in order to<br />

maximize the impact of Measure #1 Diabetes Mellitus:<br />

Hemoglobin A1c Poor Control in Diabetes Mellitus, the PQRI<br />

specifications should continue to require a performance<br />

611

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!